Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe AN150T Angler 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Lowe L1852MT 2005 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe L1852MT 2005
2005
View full specs →

Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 vs Lowe L1852MT 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 vs Lowe L1852MT 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 at 15,0 ft versus Lowe L1852MT 2005 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 tips the scales at 705 lbs — 701 lbs more than the Lowe L1852MT 2005 at 4 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 65 hp, the Lowe L1852MT 2005 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe L1852MT 2005 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 18 lbs per hp for the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Lowe L1852MT 2005 at 18,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 at 15,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelAN150T Angler
ModelL1852MT
Model Year2007
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam72 in. (1.83 m)
Beam75 in. (1.9 m)
Beam - Meters1.83
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Inches72
Beam - Inches75
Weight - Detail705 lbs. (320 kg)
Weight - Detail400 lbs. (181 kg)
Weight - kg319.78
Weight - kg181.44
Weight - lbs.705
Weight - lbs.4
Height - Detail33 in. (.83 m)
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters0.84
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches33
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.50 m)
Length - Meters4.57
Length - Meters5.48
Length - Feet15
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 0 in. (4.57 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in. (5.48 m)
Length overall - Meters4.57
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches18
Length overall - Inches216
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail21 in. (.53 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches21
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail52 in. (1.32 m)
Body / Hull
Hull thickness.072 in. (1.8 mm)
Hull thickness.072 in. (.183 cm)
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp (29 kW)
Engine max65 / 45* hp (*Remote / Tiller) (48 / 33 kw)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,256 lbs. (540 kg)
Maximum capacity1,375 lbs. (624 kg)
Maximum people6
Maximum people6
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailLB-1800-60BL - painted bunk trailer w/ swing tongue (16.5 in.)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over allTongue in: 19 ft. 2 in. (5.8 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight1,800 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width79 in
Trailer - Widthnot available

Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 vs Lowe L1852MT 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 or the Lowe L1852MT 2005?
The Lowe L1852MT 2005 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 3,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 or the Lowe L1852MT 2005?
For trailering, the Lowe L1852MT 2005 has the edge at 4 lbs dry weight versus 705 lbs for the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe L1852MT 2005 is rated to a maximum of 65 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Lowe L1852MT 2005 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe L1852MT 2005 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 18 lbs per hp for the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe L1852MT 2005 measures 75" wide, compared to 72" for the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 and Lowe L1852MT 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe AN150T Angler 2007 and the Lowe L1852MT 2005 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.