Lowe A1667WT 2010 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe A1667WT 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe Frontier 1860 2011
2011
View full specs →

Lowe A1667WT 2010 vs Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lowe A1667WT 2010 and the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe A1667WT 2010 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 tips the scales at 625 lbs — 581 lbs less than the Lowe A1667WT 2010 at 44 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 has a 35-hp advantage over the Lowe A1667WT 2010's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe A1667WT 2010 comes in at 2 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lowe A1667WT 2010 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelA1667WT
ModelFrontier 186
Model Year201
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam67 in. (1.70 m)
Beam85 in. (2.16 m)
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Meters2.16
Beam - Inches67
Beam - Inches85
Weight - Detail440 lbs. (200 kg)
Weight - Detail625 lbs. (283 kg)
Weight - kg199.58
Weight - kg283.5
Weight - lbs.44
Weight - lbs.625
Height - DetailBow Height: 27 in. (0.69 m)
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches27
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail16 ft. (4.88 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. (5.49 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches216
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail24 in. (0.61 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches24
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail60 in. (1.42 m) bottom
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.072 in. (1.8 mm)
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine maxRemote: 25 hp (19 kW) Tiller: 15 hp (11 kW)
Engine max60 hp (45 kW)
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,153 lbs. (523 kg)
Maximum capacity1,151 lbs. (522 kg)
Maximum people5 / 735 lbs. (333 kg)
Maximum people5 / 650 lbs. (295 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. (6.10 m) (trailer optional)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Lowe A1667WT 2010 vs Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe A1667WT 2010 or the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011?
The Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Lowe A1667WT 2010 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe A1667WT 2010 or the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011?
For trailering, the Lowe A1667WT 2010 has the edge at 44 lbs dry weight versus 625 lbs for the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe A1667WT 2010 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe A1667WT 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe A1667WT 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 2 lbs per hp compared to 10 lbs per hp for the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 measures 85" wide, compared to 67" for the Lowe A1667WT 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe A1667WT 2010 and Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe A1667WT 2010 and the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.