Lowe A1667WT 2010 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe A1667WT 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005
2005
View full specs →

Lowe A1667WT 2010 vs Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe A1667WT 2010 vs Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe A1667WT 2010 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 at 17,0 ft. At 44 lbs and 63 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lowe A1667WT 2010's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Lowe A1667WT 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 and its 50-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lowe A1667WT 2010 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelA1667WT
ModelFishfinder 170SE
Model Year201
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam67 in. (1.70 m)
Beam71 in. (1.80 m)
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Meters1.8
Beam - Inches67
Beam - Inches71
Weight - Detail440 lbs. (200 kg)
Weight - Detail630 lbs. (285 kg)
Weight - kg199.58
Weight - kg285.76
Weight - lbs.44
Weight - lbs.63
Height - DetailBow Height: 27 in. (0.69 m)
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches27
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.50 m)
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail16 ft. (4.88 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 0 in. (5.18 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches204
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail21 in. (.53 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches21
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail48 in. (1.2 m)
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.18
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.072 in. (1.8 mm)
Hull thickness.072 in. (1.8 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Engine maxRemote: 25 hp (19 kW) Tiller: 15 hp (11 kW)
Engine max50 hp (37 kw)
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standard40 hp Mercury Two-Stroke
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,153 lbs. (523 kg)
Maximum capacity1,186 lbs. (538 kg)
Maximum people5 / 735 lbs. (333 kg)
Maximum people5
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. (6.10 m) (trailer optional)
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. 0 in. (6.09 m)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailPainted Bunk Trailer

Lowe A1667WT 2010 vs Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe A1667WT 2010 or the Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005?
The Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Lowe A1667WT 2010 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe A1667WT 2010 or the Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005?
For trailering, the Lowe A1667WT 2010 has the edge at 44 lbs dry weight versus 63 lbs for the Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 is rated to a maximum of 50 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe A1667WT 2010 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe A1667WT 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Lowe A1667WT 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 measures 71" wide, compared to 67" for the Lowe A1667WT 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe A1667WT 2010 and Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe A1667WT 2010 and the Lowe Fishfinder 170SE 2005 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.