Matching a modified vee Lowe A1467WT 2009 against a flat Lowe L1652MT 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe A1467WT 2009 at 13,0 ft versus Lowe L1652MT 2009 at 15,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe A1467WT 2009 tips the scales at 377 lbs — 332 lbs more than the Lowe L1652MT 2009 at 45 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 30 hp for the Lowe A1467WT 2009 and 50 hp for the Lowe L1652MT 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe L1652MT 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lowe A1467WT 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lowe L1652MT 2009 and its 50-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lowe A1467WT 2009 with its 30-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.