Matching a modified vee Lowe A1467 2010 against a tunnel Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 measures 18,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 4,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe A1467 2010 at 13,9 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe A1467 2010 tips the scales at 235 lbs — 140 lbs more than the Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 at 95 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 has a 65-hp advantage over the Lowe A1467 2010's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Lowe A1467 2010 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Lowe A1467 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.