Matching a deep vee Lowe 165S Angler 2008 against a modified vee Lowe R1760SC 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe 165S Angler 2008 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe R1760SC 2011 at 17,5 ft. At 903 lbs and 876 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Lowe 165S Angler 2008 and 75 hp for the Lowe R1760SC 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lowe 165S Angler 2008 carries 13 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Lowe R1760SC 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R1760SC 2011 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Lowe 165S Angler 2008. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.