Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 850 I/O 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 860 O/B 2012
2012
View full specs →

Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 vs Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 and the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 are modified vee designs with composite construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 at 18,4 ft versus Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 at 18,5 ft. At 245 lbs and 178 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 135 hp for the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 and 150 hp for the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 carries 19 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 and Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelLX 850 I/O
ModelLX 860 O/B
Model Year2012
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 8 in. (2.33 m)
Beam7 ft. 10 in. (2.39 m)
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches92
Beam - Inches94
Deadrise21°
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches31
Weight - Detail2,450 lbs. (1,111 kg) with base engine (3.0L)
Weight - Detail1,780 lbs. (807 kg)
Weight - kg1111.3
Weight - kg807.39
Weight - lbs.245
Weight - lbs.178
Length - Feet18.42
Length - Feet18.5
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 5 in. (5.61 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in. (5.64 m)
Length overall - Meters5.61
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Inches221
Length overall - Inches222
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMerCruiser (catalyst compliant) (mandatory in U.S.)
Engine makeMercury
Engine model3.0L MPI EC
Engine model90ELPT Optimax
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. (72 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (114 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower135
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max150 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,150 lbs. (522 kg)
Maximum capacity1,850 lbs. (839 kg)
Maximum people8
Maximum people8 / 1,200 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailLX 3000 DB with swing tongue & chrome wheels
Trailer - DetailLX 3000 with swing tongue
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 4 in. (6.9 m)
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 1 in. (7.64 m)

Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 vs Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 or the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012?
The Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 is the longer of the two at 18,5 feet overall. The Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 comes in at 18,4 feet, making it roughly 0,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 or the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012?
For trailering, the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 has the edge at 178 lbs dry weight versus 245 lbs for the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 tops out at 135 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 measures 94" wide, compared to 92" for the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 or the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012?
The Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 has the bigger tank at 19 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012. That 16-gallon difference translates to roughly 48–80 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 and Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson LX 850 I/O 2012 and the Larson LX 860 O/B 2012 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.