Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012
2012
View full specs →

Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 vs Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 against a modified vee Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 at 21,1 ft versus Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 at 21,4 ft. At 27 lbs and 31 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 tops out at 22 hp. Engine specs for the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 carries 36 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 21,1 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelLX 205 S I/O
ModelLX 2150 I/O
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. (2.44 m)
Beam8 ft. 4 in. (2.54 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.54
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches1
Deadrise21°
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail34 in. (86 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches34
Weight - Detail2,700 lbs. (1,225 kg) with base engine (4.3L)
Weight - Detail3,100 lbs. (1,406 kg) with base engine (4.3L)
Weight - kg1224.7
Weight - kg1406.14
Weight - lbs.27
Weight - lbs.31
Length - Feet21.08
Length - Feet21.42
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 1 in. (6.42 m)
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 5 in. (6.53 m)
Length overall - Meters6.43
Length overall - Meters6.53
Length overall - Inches253
Length overall - Inches257
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (114 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail36 gal. (136 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters136.27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal36
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeI/O
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMerCruiser (catalyst compliant) (mandatory in U.S.)
Engine modelnot available
Engine model4.3L MPI EC
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower22
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,400 lbs. (635 kg)
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)
Maximum people8
Maximum people1
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailLX 3000 with swing tongue
Trailer - DetailLX 4600 DB with swing tongue & chrome wheels
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 3 in. (7.08 m)
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 5 in. (7.75 m)

Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 vs Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 or the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012?
The Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 is the longer of the two at 21,4 feet overall. The Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 comes in at 21,1 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 or the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012?
For trailering, the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 has the edge at 27 lbs dry weight versus 31 lbs for the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 has a documented max rating of 22 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 measures 96" wide, compared to 1" for the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 or the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012?
The Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 has the bigger tank at 36 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013. That 33-gallon difference translates to roughly 99–165 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 and Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson LX 205 S I/O 2013 and the Larson LX 2150 I/O 2012 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.