Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 620 O/B 2012
2012
View full specs →

Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 vs Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 against a modified vee Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 at 18,7 ft versus Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 at 16,2 ft. At 204 lbs and 115 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 135 hp, the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 has a 45-hp advantage over the Larson LX 620 O/B 2012's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 19 gal and 19 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 18,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelLX 185 S I/O
ModelLX 620 O/B
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m)
Beam7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches88
Deadrise21°
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches31
Weight - Detail2,040 lbs. (925 kg) with base engine (3.0L)
Weight - Detail1,150 lbs. (522 kg)
Weight - kg925.33
Weight - kg521.63
Weight - lbs.204
Weight - lbs.115
Length - Feet18.67
Length - Feet16.17
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 8 in. (5.96 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in. (4.93 m)
Length overall - Meters5.69
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Inches224
Length overall - Inches194
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMerCruiser Catalyst Compliant (mandatory in U.S.)
Engine makeMercury
Engine model3.0 MPI EC
Engine model60ELPT EFI 4S
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. (72 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. (72 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeOutboard
Horsepower135
Horsepowernot available
Engine maxnot available
Engine max90 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum capacity1,400 lbs. (635 kg)
Maximum people7
Maximum people6 / 850 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailLX 3000 DB with swing tongue & chrome wheels
Trailer - DetailLX 2200 with swing tongue
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 4 in. (6.5 m)
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 4 in. (6.5 m)

Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 vs Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 or the Larson LX 620 O/B 2012?
The Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,7 feet overall. The Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 comes in at 16,2 feet, making it roughly 2,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 or the Larson LX 620 O/B 2012?
For trailering, the Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 has the edge at 115 lbs dry weight versus 204 lbs for the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 is rated to a maximum of 135 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 and Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 share an 7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 and Larson LX 620 O/B 2012?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 19 gallons and 19 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 and Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson LX 185 S I/O 2013 and the Larson LX 620 O/B 2012 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.