Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Larson LXi 288 2009 boat specs
Larson
Larson LXi 288 2009
2009
View full specs →

Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 288 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 against a modified vee Larson LXi 288 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson LXi 288 2009 measures 29,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 10,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 at 18,5 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson LXi 288 2009 tips the scales at 6 225 lbs — 4 046 lbs less than the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 at 2 179 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 carries a rated maximum of 150 hp. Engine data for the Larson LXi 288 2009 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 3 gal and 1 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Larson LXi 288 2009 at 29,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 at 18,5 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelLX 180 S O/B
ModelLXi 288
Model Year2013
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 10 in. (2.39 m)
Beam9 ft. 0 in. (2.74 m)
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inches94
Beam - Inches108
Deadrise21°
Deadrise24℃
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail39 in. (99.1 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.99
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches39
Weight - Detail2,179 lbs. (988 kg) with Mercury 115 4S
Weight - Detail6,225 lbs. (2,820 kg)
Weight - kg988.38
Weight - kg2823.61
Weight - lbs.2179
Weight - lbs.6225
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Feet29
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in. (5.64 m)
Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.89 m)
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Meters8.89
Length overall - Inches222
Length overall - Inches35
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters8.89
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (114 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeI/O
Engine max150 hp
Engine maxnot available
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,850 lbs. (839 kg)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people8
Maximum peoplenot available
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity12.5 gal. (47 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail20 gal. (75.7 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters75.71
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal2
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailLX 3400 with swing tongue
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 1 in. (7.64 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 288 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 2009?
The Larson LXi 288 2009 is the longer of the two at 29,0 feet overall. The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 comes in at 18,5 feet, making it roughly 10,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 2009?
For trailering, the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 has the edge at 2 179 lbs dry weight versus 6 225 lbs for the Larson LXi 288 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LXi 288 2009 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson LXi 288 2009 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson LXi 288 2009 measures 108" wide, compared to 94" for the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 288 2009?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 3 gallons and 1 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 288 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 and the Larson LXi 288 2009 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.