Larson LSR 2100 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LSR 2100 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 boat specs
Larson
Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012
2012
View full specs →

Larson LSR 2100 2013 vs Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Larson LSR 2100 2013 against a modified vee Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 measures 29,2 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 8,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson LSR 2100 2013 at 21,1 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 tips the scales at 597 lbs — 570 lbs less than the Larson LSR 2100 2013 at 27 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 tops out at 3 hp. Engine specs for the Larson LSR 2100 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 3 gal and 1 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 at 29,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Larson LSR 2100 2013 at 21,1 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelLSR 21
ModelLXi 288 I/O
Model Year2013
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. (2.44 m)
Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches108
Deadrise21°
Deadrise24°
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail39 in. (99.1 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.99
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches39
Weight - Detail2,700 lbs. (1,225 kg) with base engine (4.3L)
Weight - Detail5,970 lbs. (2,687 kg) with base engine (5.0L)
Weight - kg1224.7
Weight - kg2707.94
Weight - lbs.27
Weight - lbs.597
Length - Feet21.08
Length - Feet29.17
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 1 in. (6.42 m)
Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.69 m)
Length overall - Meters6.43
Length overall - Meters8.89
Length overall - Inches253
Length overall - Inches35
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (114 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMerCruiser (catalyst compliant) (mandatory in U.S.)
Engine modelnot available
Engine model350 Mag MPI EC BIII
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower3
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,400 lbs. (635 kg)
Maximum capacity1,850 lbs. (840 kg)
Maximum people8
Maximum peoplenot available
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity20 gal. (75.7 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail12.5 gal. (47 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters49.21
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal12.5
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailLSR 3400 DB with swing tongue, chrome wheels and diamond plated fenders
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 3 in. (7.08 m)
Trailer - Length over all34 ft. 9 in. (10.59 m)

Larson LSR 2100 2013 vs Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson LSR 2100 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012?
The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 is the longer of the two at 29,2 feet overall. The Larson LSR 2100 2013 comes in at 21,1 feet, making it roughly 8,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson LSR 2100 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012?
For trailering, the Larson LSR 2100 2013 has the edge at 27 lbs dry weight versus 597 lbs for the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 has a documented max rating of 3 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LSR 2100 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson LSR 2100 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 measures 108" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson LSR 2100 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson LSR 2100 2013 and Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 3 gallons and 1 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson LSR 2100 2013 and Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson LSR 2100 2013 and the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2012 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.