Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 boat specs
Larson
Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013
2013
View full specs →

Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 vs Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 against a deep vee Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 at 18,5 ft versus Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 at 20,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 tips the scales at 2 768 lbs — 2 586 lbs less than the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 at 182 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 250 hp, the Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 has a 75-hp advantage over the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012's 175-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 35 gal and 35 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 7 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 and its 250-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 with its 175-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelFX 1850 DC O/B
ModelFX 2050 DC O/B
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 8 in. (2.39 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches92
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise21°
Deadrise16°
Weight - Detail1,820 lbs. (819 kg)
Weight - Detail2,768 lbs. (1,255 kg) with Evinrude 25
Weight - kg825.54
Weight - kg1255.54
Weight - lbs.182
Weight - lbs.2768
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Feet20.17
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in. (5.64 m)
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 2 in. (6.14 m)
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Meters6.15
Length overall - Inches222
Length overall - Inches242
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail26 in. (66 cm)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches26
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeMercury
Engine makenot available
Engine model90ELPT Optimax
Engine modelnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (128 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (132 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max175 hp
Engine max250 hp (186 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,850 lbs. (839 kg)
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs. (907 kg)
Maximum people7 / 1,200 lbs
Maximum people7
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 3000 DB with swing tongue & chrome wheels
Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 4000 with swing tongue
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 8 in. (6.6 m)
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 4 in. (6.8 m)

Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 vs Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 or the Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013?
The Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,2 feet overall. The Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 comes in at 18,5 feet, making it roughly 1,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 or the Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013?
For trailering, the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 has the edge at 182 lbs dry weight versus 2 768 lbs for the Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 is rated to a maximum of 250 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 tops out at 175 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 92" for the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 and Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 35 gallons and 35 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 and Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson FX 1850 DC O/B 2012 and the Larson FX 2050 DC O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.