Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004?

For trailering, the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 has the edge at 48 lbs dry weight versus 1 972 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 90 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004?

The Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 has the bigger tank at 97 gallons, versus 22 gallons on the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013. That 75-gallon difference translates to roughly 225–375 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Q: Are the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 and the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004

Larson

Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013

2013

View full specs →

Larson

Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004

2004

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 carries a rated maximum of 90 hp. Engine data for the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 carries 97 gallons versus 22 gallons in the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 0,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeLarson

ModelFX 1750 TL O/B

ModelLXi 270 I/O

Model Year2013

Model Year2004

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam8 ft. (2.44 m)

Beam8 ft. 6 in

Beam - Meters2.44

Beam - Meters2.59

Beam - Inches96

Beam - Inches102

Deadrise16°

Deadrise24℃

Depth - Detail24 in. (61 cm)

Depth - Detailnot available

Depth - Centimeters60.96

Depth - Centimetersnot available

Depth - Inches24

Depth - Inchesnot available

Weight - Detail1,972 lbs. (895 kg) with Yamaha F9

Weight - Detail4,800 lbs

Weight - kg894.48

Weight - kg2177.24

Weight - lbs.1972

Weight - lbs.48

Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)

Height [transom]not available

Length - Feet17.42

Length - Feetnot available

Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in. (5.31 m)

Length overall - Detail26 ft. 4 in

Length overall - Meters5.31

Length overall - Meters8.03

Length overall - Inches209

Length overall - Inches316

Draft [max] - Detailnot available

Draft [max] - Detail38 in

Draft [max] - Metersnot available

Draft [max] - Meters0.97

Draft [max] - Inchesnot available

Draft [max] - Inches38

Body / Hull

Hull materialComposite

Hull materialFiberglass

Hull typeDeep Vee

Hull typenot available

Engine and Drivetrain

Fuel tank capacity - Detail22 gal. (83.27 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Detail97 gal

Fuel tank capacity - Liters83.28

Fuel tank capacity - Liters367.18

Fuel tank capacity - Gal22

Fuel tank capacity - Gal97

Fuel typeGas

Fuel typenot available

Drive typeOutboard

Drive typenot available

Engine max90 hp (67 kW)

Engine maxnot available

Operational Info

Maximum capacity1,300 lbs. (590 kg)

Maximum capacitynot available

Maximum people6

Maximum peoplenot available

Trailer Info

Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 2300 with swing tongue

Trailer - Detailnot available

Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 7 in. (5.97 m)

Trailer - Length over allnot available

Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004?

For trailering, the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 has the edge at 48 lbs dry weight versus 1 972 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 90 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004?

The Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 has the bigger tank at 97 gallons, versus 22 gallons on the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013. That 75-gallon difference translates to roughly 225–375 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Are the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 and the Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Larson FX 1750 TL O/B 2013 full specs ← Larson LXi 270 I/O 2004 full specs