Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004?

For trailering, the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has the edge at 1 999 lbs dry weight versus 2 925 lbs for the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 measures 99" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004?

The Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 has the bigger tank at 35 gallons, versus 22 gallons on the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Q: Are the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004

Larson

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013

2013

View full specs →

Larson

Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004

2004

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 carries a rated maximum of 150 hp. Engine data for the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 carries 35 gallons versus 22 gallons in the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.

General Boat Info

MakeLarson

ModelFX 1750 SC O/B

ModelLXi 210 I/O

Model Year2013

Model Year2004

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam8 ft. (2.44 m)

Beam8 ft. 3 in

Beam - Meters2.44

Beam - Meters2.51

Beam - Inches96

Beam - Inches99

Deadrise16°

Deadrise21℃

Depth - Detail24 in. (61 cm)

Depth - Detailnot available

Depth - Centimeters60.96

Depth - Centimetersnot available

Depth - Inches24

Depth - Inchesnot available

Weight - Detail1,999 lbs. (907 kg) with Mercury 115 4S

Weight - Detail2,925 lbs

Weight - kg906.73

Weight - kg1326.76

Weight - lbs.1999

Weight - lbs.2925

Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)

Height [transom]not available

Length - Feet17.42

Length - Feetnot available

Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in. (5.31 m)

Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in

Length overall - Meters5.31

Length overall - Meters6.25

Length overall - Inches209

Length overall - Inches246

Draft [max] - Detailnot available

Draft [max] - Detail32 in

Draft [max] - Metersnot available

Draft [max] - Meters0.81

Draft [max] - Inchesnot available

Draft [max] - Inches32

Body / Hull

Hull materialComposite

Hull materialFiberglass

Hull typeDeep Vee

Hull typenot available

Engine and Drivetrain

Fuel tank capacity - Detail22 gal. (83.27 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal

Fuel tank capacity - Liters83.28

Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49

Fuel tank capacity - Gal22

Fuel tank capacity - Gal35

Fuel typeGas

Fuel typenot available

Drive typeOutboard

Drive typenot available

Engine max150 hp (112 kW)

Engine maxnot available

Operational Info

Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)

Maximum capacity1,775 lbs

Maximum people6

Maximum peoplenot available

Trailer Info

Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 2300 with swing tongue

Trailer - Detailnot available

Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 7 in. (5.97 m)

Trailer - Length over allnot available

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004?

For trailering, the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has the edge at 1 999 lbs dry weight versus 2 925 lbs for the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 measures 99" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004?

The Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 has the bigger tank at 35 gallons, versus 22 gallons on the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. That 13-gallon difference translates to roughly 39–65 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Are the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and the Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 full specs ← Larson LXi 210 I/O 2004 full specs