Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is the larger boat — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012?

The Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 is the longer of the two at 20,5 feet overall. The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 comes in at 17,4 feet, making it roughly 3,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012?

For trailering, the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 has the edge at 309 lbs dry weight versus 1 999 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 tops out at 22 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 measures 99" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has the bigger tank at 22 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012. That 19-gallon difference translates to roughly 57–95 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Q: Are the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012

Larson

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013

2013

View full specs →

Larson

Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012

2012

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 against a modified vee Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 measures 20,5 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 3,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 at 17,4 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 tips the scales at 1 999 lbs — 1 690 lbs more than the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 at 309 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has a 128-hp advantage over the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012's 22-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 carries 22 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 20,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeLarson

ModelFX 1750 SC O/B

ModelLX 2060 Cuddy I/O

Model Year2013

Model Year2012

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam8 ft. (2.44 m)

Beam8 ft. 3 in. (2.5 m)

Beam - Meters2.44

Beam - Meters2.51

Beam - Inches96

Beam - Inches99

Deadrise16°

Deadrise21°

Depth - Detail24 in. (61 cm)

Depth - Detailnot available

Depth - Centimeters60.96

Depth - Centimetersnot available

Depth - Inches24

Depth - Inchesnot available

Weight - Detail1,999 lbs. (907 kg) with Mercury 115 4S

Weight - Detail3,090 lbs. (1,380 kg) with base engine (4.3L)

Weight - kg906.73

Weight - kg1401.6

Weight - lbs.1999

Weight - lbs.309

Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)

Height [transom]not available

Length - Feet17.42

Length - Feet20.5

Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in. (5.31 m)

Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in. (6.25 m)

Length overall - Meters5.31

Length overall - Meters6.25

Length overall - Inches209

Length overall - Inches246

Draft [max] - Detailnot available

Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (83.9 cm)

Draft [max] - Metersnot available

Draft [max] - Meters0.84

Draft [max] - Inchesnot available

Draft [max] - Inches33

Body / Hull

Hull materialComposite

Hull typeDeep Vee

Hull typeModified Vee

Engine and Drivetrain

Fuel tank capacity - Detail22 gal. (83.27 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (114 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Liters83.28

Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56

Fuel tank capacity - Gal22

Fuel tank capacity - Gal3

Fuel typeGas

Drive typeOutboard

Drive typeI/O

Engine max150 hp (112 kW)

Engine maxnot available

Engine makenot available

Engine makeMerCruiser (catalyst compliant) (mandatory in U.S.)

Engine modelnot available

Engine model4.3L MPI EC

Horsepowernot available

Horsepower22

Operational Info

Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)

Maximum people6

Maximum people8

Trailer Info

Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 2300 with swing tongue

Trailer - DetailSZA 5200 DB with swing tongue & custom wheels

Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 7 in. (5.97 m)

Trailer - Length over all26 ft. 9 in. (8.15 m)

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 vs Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012?

The Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 is the longer of the two at 20,5 feet overall. The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 comes in at 17,4 feet, making it roughly 3,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.

Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012?

For trailering, the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 has the edge at 309 lbs dry weight versus 1 999 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 tops out at 22 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 measures 99" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 or the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has the bigger tank at 22 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012. That 19-gallon difference translates to roughly 57–95 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Are the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 and the Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 full specs ← Larson LX 2060 Cuddy I/O 2012 full specs