Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Larson SEi 180 Ski  Fish  2009 boat specs
Larson
Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009
2009
View full specs →

Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 vs Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 against a modified vee Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 at 17,4 ft versus Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 tips the scales at 2 133 lbs — 1 868 lbs more than the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 at 265 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 carries a rated maximum of 150 hp. Engine data for the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 22 gal and 23 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 and Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelFX 1750 DC O/B
ModelSEi 180 Ski Fish
Model Year2013
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. (2.43 m)
Beam7 ft. 9 in. (2.36 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches93
Deadrise16°
Deadrise21℃
Depth - Detail24 in. (61 cm)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters60.96
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches24
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail2,133 lbs. (967 kg) with Evinrude 15
Weight - Detail2,650 lbs. (1,202 kg)
Weight - kg967.51
Weight - kg1202.02
Weight - lbs.2133
Weight - lbs.265
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet17.42
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in. (5.31 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in. (5.33 m)
Length overall - Meters5.31
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Inches209
Length overall - Inches21
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (78.7 cm)
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches31
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5.33
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Body / Hull
Hull materialComposite
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail22 gal. (83.27 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters83.28
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Gal22
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeI/O
Engine max150 hp (112 kW)
Engine maxnot available
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum people6
Maximum people6
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 2300 with swing tongue
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 7 in. (5.97 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 vs Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 or the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009?
The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 is the longer of the two at 17,4 feet overall. The Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 0,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 or the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009?
For trailering, the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 has the edge at 265 lbs dry weight versus 2 133 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 measures 96" wide, compared to 93" for the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 and Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 22 gallons and 23 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 and Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 and the Larson SEi 180 Ski Fish 2009 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.