Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is the larger boat — the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011?

The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 is the longer of the two at 29,2 feet overall. The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 comes in at 17,4 feet, making it roughly 11,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011?

For trailering, the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 has the edge at 597 lbs dry weight versus 2 133 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 is rated to a maximum of 430 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 measures 108" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011?

The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 has the bigger tank at 22 gallons, versus 1 gallons on the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011. That 21-gallon difference translates to roughly 63–105 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Q: Are the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 and the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011

Larson

Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013

2013

View full specs →

Larson

Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011

2011

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 against a modified vee Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 measures 29,2 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 11,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 at 17,4 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 tips the scales at 2 133 lbs — 1 536 lbs more than the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 at 597 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 430 hp, the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 has a 280-hp advantage over the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 carries 22 gallons versus 1 gallons in the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 29,2 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeLarson

ModelFX 1750 DC O/B

ModelLXi 288 I/O

Model Year2013

Model Year2011

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam8 ft. (2.43 m)

Beam9 ft. (2.74 m)

Beam - Meters2.44

Beam - Meters2.74

Beam - Inches96

Beam - Inches108

Deadrise16°

Deadrise24°

Depth - Detail24 in. (61 cm)

Depth - Detailnot available

Depth - Centimeters60.96

Depth - Centimetersnot available

Depth - Inches24

Depth - Inchesnot available

Weight - Detail2,133 lbs. (967 kg) with Evinrude 15

Weight - Detail5,970 lbs. (2,687 kg) with base engine

Weight - kg967.51

Weight - kg2707.94

Weight - lbs.2133

Weight - lbs.597

Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)

Height [transom]not available

Length - Feet17.42

Length - Feet29.17

Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in. (5.31 m)

Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.89 m)

Length overall - Meters5.31

Length overall - Meters8.89

Length overall - Inches209

Length overall - Inches35

Draft [max] - Detailnot available

Draft [max] - Detail39 in. (99.1 cm)

Draft [max] - Metersnot available

Draft [max] - Meters0.99

Draft [max] - Inchesnot available

Draft [max] - Inches39

Body / Hull

Hull materialComposite

Hull materialFiberglass

Hull typeDeep Vee

Hull typeModified Vee

Engine and Drivetrain

Fuel tank capacity - Detail22 gal. (83.27 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Liters83.28

Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54

Fuel tank capacity - Gal22

Fuel tank capacity - Gal1

Fuel typeGas

Drive typeOutboard

Drive typeI/O

Engine max150 hp (112 kW)

Engine max430 hp

Engine/s standardnot available

Engine/s standardMerCruiser 350 Mag MPI BIII

Horsepowernot available

Horsepower300 hp

Operational Info

Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)

Maximum capacitynot available

Maximum people6

Maximum peoplenot available

Water capacitynot available

Water capacity20 gal. (75.7 l)

Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available

Holding tank capacity - Detail12.5 gal. (47 l)

Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available

Holding tank capacity - Liters49.21

Holding tank capacity - Galnot available

Holding tank capacity - Gal12.5

Trailer Info

Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 2300 with swing tongue

Trailer - Detailnot available

Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 7 in. (5.97 m)

Trailer - Length over all34 ft. 9 in. (10.59 m)

Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 vs Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011?

The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 is the longer of the two at 29,2 feet overall. The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 comes in at 17,4 feet, making it roughly 11,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.

Which is easier to trailer — the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011?

For trailering, the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 has the edge at 597 lbs dry weight versus 2 133 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 is rated to a maximum of 430 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 measures 108" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 or the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011?

The Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 has the bigger tank at 22 gallons, versus 1 gallons on the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011. That 21-gallon difference translates to roughly 63–105 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Are the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 and Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 and the Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Larson FX 1750 DC O/B 2013 full specs ← Larson LXi 288 I/O 2011 full specs