Larson Escape 254 2009 boat specs
Larson
Larson Escape 254 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 160 O/B 2013
2013
View full specs →

Larson Escape 254 2009 vs Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson Escape 254 2009 against a deep vee Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson Escape 254 2009 measures 25,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 8,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 at 16,2 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 tips the scales at 1 549 lbs — 1 084 lbs less than the Larson Escape 254 2009 at 465 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 tops out at 90 hp. Engine specs for the Larson Escape 254 2009 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson Escape 254 2009 carries 59 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson Escape 254 2009 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson Escape 254 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson Escape 254 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 25,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelEscape 254
ModelLX 160 O/B
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches88
Deadrise16℃
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches31
Weight - Detail4,650 lbs. (2,110 kg)
Weight - Detail1,549 lbs. (703 kg) with Mercury 90 4S
Weight - kg2109.2
Weight - kg702.61
Weight - lbs.465
Weight - lbs.1549
Length - Meters7.65
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet25
Length - Feet16.17
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail25 ft. 1 in. (7.65 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in. (4.93 m)
Length overall - Meters7.65
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Inches301
Length overall - Inches194
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail59 gal. (223 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. (72 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters223.34
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal59
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max90 hp
Operational Info
Water capacity12 gal. (45.4 l)
Water capacitynot available
Maximum capacity2,100 lbs. (953 kg)
Maximum capacity1,400 lbs. (635 kg)
Maximum people12
Maximum people6
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailLX 2200 with swing tongue
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 4 in. (6.5 m)

Larson Escape 254 2009 vs Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson Escape 254 2009 or the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013?
The Larson Escape 254 2009 is the longer of the two at 25,0 feet overall. The Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 comes in at 16,2 feet, making it roughly 8,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Escape 254 2009 or the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013?
For trailering, the Larson Escape 254 2009 has the edge at 465 lbs dry weight versus 1 549 lbs for the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 90 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson Escape 254 2009 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson Escape 254 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson Escape 254 2009 measures 102" wide, compared to 88" for the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson Escape 254 2009 or the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013?
The Larson Escape 254 2009 has the bigger tank at 59 gallons, versus 19 gallons on the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013. That 40-gallon difference translates to roughly 120–200 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson Escape 254 2009 and Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson Escape 254 2009 and the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.