Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 boat specs
Larson
Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013
2013
View full specs →

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 vs Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 against a deep vee Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 measures 18,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 16,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 at 2,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 tips the scales at 2 179 lbs — 2 148 lbs less than the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 at 31 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Engine specs for the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 5 gal and 3 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelEscape 204 I/O
ModelLX 180 S O/B
Model Year2006
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam7 ft. 10 in. (2.39 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches94
Deadrise17℃
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail29 in. (73.7 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.74
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Inches29
Draft [max] - Inches31
Weight - Detail3,100 lbs. (1,406 kg)
Weight - Detail2,179 lbs. (988 kg) with Mercury 115 4S
Weight - kg1406.14
Weight - kg988.38
Weight - lbs.31
Weight - lbs.2179
Length - Meters6.1
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in. (6.10 m)
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in. (5.64 m)
Length overall - Meters6.12
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Inches241
Length overall - Inches222
Body / Hull
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialComposite
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal. (189 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (114 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Gal5
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeOutboard
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Engine maxnot available
Engine max150 hp
Operational Info
Water capacity5 gal. (19 l)
Water capacitynot available
Maximum people11
Maximum people8
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,850 lbs. (839 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailLX 3400 with swing tongue
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all25 ft. 1 in. (7.64 m)

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 vs Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 or the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013?
The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,5 feet overall. The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 16,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 or the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013?
For trailering, the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 has the edge at 31 lbs dry weight versus 2 179 lbs for the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 measures 102" wide, compared to 94" for the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 and Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 5 gallons and 3 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 and Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2006 and the Larson LX 180 S O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.