Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 vs Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 or the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013?

For trailering, the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 has the edge at 31 lbs dry weight versus 1 999 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 or the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has the bigger tank at 22 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005. That 17-gallon difference translates to roughly 51–85 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Q: Are the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 and Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 and the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 vs Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013

Larson

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005

2005

View full specs →

Larson

Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013

2013

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 vs Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 vs Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Engine specs for the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 carries 22 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 0,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeLarson

ModelEscape 204 I/O

ModelFX 1750 SC O/B

Model Year2005

Model Year2013

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam8 ft. 6 in

Beam8 ft. (2.44 m)

Beam - Meters2.59

Beam - Meters2.44

Beam - Inches102

Beam - Inches96

Deadrise17℃

Deadrise16°

Draft [max] - Detail29 in

Draft [max] - Detailnot available

Draft [max] - Meters0.74

Draft [max] - Metersnot available

Draft [max] - Inches29

Draft [max] - Inchesnot available

Weight - Detail3,100 lbs

Weight - Detail1,999 lbs. (907 kg) with Mercury 115 4S

Weight - kg1406.14

Weight - kg906.73

Weight - lbs.31

Weight - lbs.1999

Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in

Length overall - Detail17 ft. 5 in. (5.31 m)

Length overall - Meters6.12

Length overall - Meters5.31

Length overall - Inches241

Length overall - Inches209

Depth - Detailnot available

Depth - Detail24 in. (61 cm)

Depth - Centimetersnot available

Depth - Centimeters60.96

Depth - Inchesnot available

Depth - Inches24

Height [transom]not available

Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)

Length - Feetnot available

Length - Feet17.42

Body / Hull

Hull materialFiberglass

Hull materialComposite

Hull typenot available

Hull typeDeep Vee

Engine and Drivetrain

Fuel tank capacity - Detail5 gal

Fuel tank capacity - Detail22 gal. (83.27 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Liters18.93

Fuel tank capacity - Liters83.28

Fuel tank capacity - Gal5

Fuel tank capacity - Gal22

Fuel typenot available

Fuel typeGas

Drive typenot available

Drive typeOutboard

Engine maxnot available

Engine max150 hp (112 kW)

Operational Info

Maximum capacity1,550 lbs

Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)

Maximum people11 Persons

Maximum people6

Trailer Info

Trailer - Detailnot available

Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 2300 with swing tongue

Trailer - Length over allnot available

Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 7 in. (5.97 m)

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 vs Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 or the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013?

For trailering, the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 has the edge at 31 lbs dry weight versus 1 999 lbs for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 150 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 or the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013?

The Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 has the bigger tank at 22 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005. That 17-gallon difference translates to roughly 51–85 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Are the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 and Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 and the Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Larson Escape 204 I/O 2005 full specs ← Larson FX 1750 SC O/B 2013 full specs