Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 vs Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 or the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013?

For trailering, the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 has the edge at 31 lbs dry weight versus 2 579 lbs for the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 200 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?

Both the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 and Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.

Q: Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 or the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013?

The Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 has the bigger tank at 35 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004. That 30-gallon difference translates to roughly 90–150 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Q: Are the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 and Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 and the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 vs Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013

Larson

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004

2004

View full specs →

Larson

Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013

2013

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 vs Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 vs Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

The Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Engine specs for the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 carries 35 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 20,2 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeLarson

ModelEscape 204 I/O

ModelFX 2050 TL O/B

Model Year2004

Model Year2013

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam8 ft. 6 in

Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)

Beam - Meters2.59

Beam - Inches102

Deadrise17℃

Deadrise16°

Draft [max] - Detail29 in

Draft [max] - Detailnot available

Draft [max] - Meters0.74

Draft [max] - Metersnot available

Draft [max] - Inches29

Draft [max] - Inchesnot available

Weight - Detail3,100 lbs

Weight - Detail2,579 lbs. (1,170 kg) with Mercury 150 4S

Weight - kg1406.14

Weight - kg1169.81

Weight - lbs.31

Weight - lbs.2579

Length overall - Detail20 ft. 1 in

Length overall - Detail20 ft. 2 in. (6.14 m)

Length overall - Meters6.12

Length overall - Meters6.15

Length overall - Inches241

Length overall - Inches242

Depth - Detailnot available

Depth - Detail26 in. (66 cm)

Depth - Centimetersnot available

Depth - Centimeters66.04

Depth - Inchesnot available

Depth - Inches26

Height [transom]not available

Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)

Length - Feetnot available

Length - Feet20.17

Body / Hull

Hull materialFiberglass

Hull materialComposite

Hull typenot available

Hull typeDeep Vee

Engine and Drivetrain

Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal

Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (132 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27

Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49

Fuel tank capacity - Gal5

Fuel tank capacity - Gal35

Fuel typenot available

Fuel typeGas

Drive typenot available

Drive typeOutboard

Engine maxnot available

Engine max200 hp (149 kW)

Operational Info

Maximum capacity1,550 lbs

Maximum capacity1,750 lbs. (794 kg)

Maximum peoplenot available

Maximum people7

Trailer Info

Trailer - Detailnot available

Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 4000 with swing tongue

Trailer - Length over allnot available

Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 4 in. (6.8 m)

Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 vs Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 or the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013?

For trailering, the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 has the edge at 31 lbs dry weight versus 2 579 lbs for the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 200 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?

Both the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 and Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 share an 8 ft. 6 in beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.

Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 or the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013?

The Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 has the bigger tank at 35 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004. That 30-gallon difference translates to roughly 90–150 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Are the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 and Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 and the Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Larson Escape 204 I/O 2004 full specs ← Larson FX 2050 TL O/B 2013 full specs