Larson Cabrio 290 2007 boat specs
Larson
Larson Cabrio 290 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013
2013
View full specs →

Larson Cabrio 290 2007 vs Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson Cabrio 290 2007 against a deep vee Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson Cabrio 290 2007 at 27,0 ft versus Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 at 29,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 tips the scales at 597 lbs — 588 lbs less than the Larson Cabrio 290 2007 at 9 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson Cabrio 290 2007 carries a rated maximum of 320 hp. Engine data for the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 1 gal and 1 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 8 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 at 29,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Larson Cabrio 290 2007 at 27,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelCabrio? 29
ModelLXi 292 I/O
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.9 m)
Beam9 ft. (3 m)
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Meters2.74
Beam - Inches114
Beam - Inches108
Bridge clearance - Detailw/o Arch: 7 ft. 1 in. (2.16 m) w/Arch: 8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.59
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches102
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise24°
Draft [max] - Detail28 in. (71.1 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail39 in. (99.1 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.71
Draft [max] - Meters0.99
Draft [max] - Inches28
Draft [max] - Inches39
Weight - Detail9,000 lbs. (4,082 kg)
Weight - Detail5,970 lbs. (2,687 kg) with base engine (350 Mag)
Weight - kg4082.33
Weight - kg2707.94
Weight - lbs.9
Weight - lbs.597
Length - Meters8.26
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet27
Length - Feet29.17
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail27 ft. 10 in. (8.26 m)
Length overall - Detail29 ft. 2 in. (8.69 m)
Length overall - Meters8.48
Length overall - Meters8.89
Length overall - Inches334
Length overall - Inches35
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeInboard/Outboard
Drive typeI/O
Engine max320 hp
Engine maxnot available
Operational Info
Headroom6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)
Headroomnot available
Water capacity28 gal. (106 l)
Water capacity20 gal. (75.7 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail28 gal. (106 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail13 gal. (47 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters105.99
Holding tank capacity - Liters49.21
Holding tank capacity - Gal28
Holding tank capacity - Gal13
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all34 ft. 9 in. (10.59 m)

Larson Cabrio 290 2007 vs Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson Cabrio 290 2007 or the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013?
The Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 is the longer of the two at 29,2 feet overall. The Larson Cabrio 290 2007 comes in at 27,0 feet, making it roughly 2,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Cabrio 290 2007 or the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013?
For trailering, the Larson Cabrio 290 2007 has the edge at 9 lbs dry weight versus 597 lbs for the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson Cabrio 290 2007 has a documented max rating of 320 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson Cabrio 290 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson Cabrio 290 2007 measures 114" wide, compared to 108" for the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson Cabrio 290 2007 and Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 1 gallons and 1 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson Cabrio 290 2007 and Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson Cabrio 290 2007 and the Larson LXi 292 I/O 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.