Larson Cabrio 240  2008 boat specs
Larson
Larson Cabrio 240 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Larson Cabrio 857 2011 boat specs
Larson
Larson Cabrio 857 2011
2011
View full specs →

Larson Cabrio 240 2008 vs Larson Cabrio 857 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson Cabrio 240 2008 against a deep vee Larson Cabrio 857 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson Cabrio 857 2011 measures 28,2 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 4,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson Cabrio 240 2008 at 24,0 feet (2008). At 575 lbs and 665 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 400 hp, the Larson Cabrio 857 2011 has a 80-hp advantage over the Larson Cabrio 240 2008's 320-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 84 gal and 84 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Bottom line: The Larson Cabrio 857 2011 at 28,2 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Larson Cabrio 240 2008 at 24,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelCabrio 24
ModelCabrio 857
Model Year2008
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 10 in. (2.69 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.69
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches106
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 7 ft. 7 in. (2.35 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail7 ft. 10 in. (2.39 m) without arch 9 ft. 2 in. (2.8 m) with arch
Bridge clearance - Meters2.31
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Inches91
Bridge clearance - Inches11
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise20°
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (88.9 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches35
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail5,750 lbs. (2,608 kg)
Weight - Detail6,650 lbs. (3,016 kg)
Weight - kg2608.15
Weight - kg3016.39
Weight - lbs.575
Weight - lbs.665
Length - Meters7.53
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet24
Length - Feet28.17
Length - Inches7
Length - Inchesnot available
Length [over all with swim platform]With Pulpit: 24 ft. 7 in. (7.53 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 1 in. (8.57 m) with pulpit
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters8.56
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches337
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail84 gal. (318 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail84 gal. (318 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters317.97
Fuel tank capacity - Liters317.97
Fuel tank capacity - Gal84
Fuel tank capacity - Gal84
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeInboard/Outboard
Drive typeI/O
Engine max320 hp
Engine max400 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMerCruiser 5.0L Mag MPI BIII
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower300 hp
Operational Info
Head1
Headnot available
Headroom6 ft. 1 in. (1.86 m)
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m) in cabin
Water heater capacity19 gal. (72 l)
Water heater capacitynot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail12 gal. (45 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail12 gal. (45 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters45.42
Holding tank capacity - Liters45.42
Holding tank capacity - Gal12
Holding tank capacity - Gal12
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity19 gal. (72 l)

Larson Cabrio 240 2008 vs Larson Cabrio 857 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson Cabrio 240 2008 or the Larson Cabrio 857 2011?
The Larson Cabrio 857 2011 is the longer of the two at 28,2 feet overall. The Larson Cabrio 240 2008 comes in at 24,0 feet, making it roughly 4,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Cabrio 240 2008 or the Larson Cabrio 857 2011?
For trailering, the Larson Cabrio 240 2008 has the edge at 575 lbs dry weight versus 665 lbs for the Larson Cabrio 857 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Larson Cabrio 857 2011 is rated to a maximum of 400 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson Cabrio 240 2008 tops out at 320 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many passengers can the Larson Cabrio 857 2011 carry?
The Larson Cabrio 857 2011 has an official capacity rating of 8 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson Cabrio 857 2011 measures 106" wide, compared to 102" for the Larson Cabrio 240 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson Cabrio 240 2008 and Larson Cabrio 857 2011?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 84 gallons and 84 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson Cabrio 240 2008 and Larson Cabrio 857 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson Cabrio 240 2008 and the Larson Cabrio 857 2011 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.