Larson Cabrio 220 2009 boat specs
Larson
Larson Cabrio 220 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Larson Cabrio 290 2008 boat specs
Larson
Larson Cabrio 290 2008
2008
View full specs →

Larson Cabrio 220 2009 vs Larson Cabrio 290 2008 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 and the Larson Cabrio 290 2008 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson Cabrio 290 2008 measures 27,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 5,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 at 22,0 feet (2009). At 42 lbs and 9 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The Larson Cabrio 290 2008 tops out at 320 hp. Engine specs for the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 carries 6 gallons versus 1 gallons in the Larson Cabrio 290 2008. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

The Larson Cabrio 220 2009 is rated for up to 1 people. Passenger data for the Larson Cabrio 290 2008 wasn't available.

Bottom line: The Larson Cabrio 290 2008 at 27,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Larson Cabrio 220 2009 at 22,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
ModelCabrio 22
ModelCabrio 29
Model Year2009
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 5 in. (2.55 m)
Beam9 ft. 6 in. (2.9 m)
Beam - Meters2.57
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Inches101
Beam - Inches114
Bridge clearance - Detail5 ft. 4 in. (1.63 m)
Bridge clearance - DetailWithout Arch: 7 ft. 1 in. (2.16 m) With Arch: 8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters1.63
Bridge clearance - Meters2.59
Bridge clearance - Inches64
Bridge clearance - Inches102
Deadrise18℃
Deadrise20℃
Draft [max] - Detail32 in. (81.3 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail28 in. (71.1 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.81
Draft [max] - Meters0.71
Draft [max] - Inches32
Draft [max] - Inches28
Weight - Detail4,200 lbs. (1,905 kg)
Weight - Detail9,000 lbs. (4,082 kg)
Weight - kg1905.09
Weight - kg4082.33
Weight - lbs.42
Weight - lbs.9
Length - Meters6.73
Length - Meters8.26
Length - Feet22
Length - Feet27
Length - Inches1
Length - Inches1
Length [over all with swim platform]With Pulpit: 22 ft. 1 in. (6.73 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]With Pulpit: 27 ft. 10 in. (8.26 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail60 gal. (227 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail100 gal. (379 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters227.12
Fuel tank capacity - Liters378.54
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Fuel tank capacity - Gal1
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeInboard/Outboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max320 hp
Operational Info
Head1
Head1
Water capacity5 gal. (19 l) optional
Water capacity28 gal. (106 l)
Maximum capacity1,975 lbs. (896 kg)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people1
Maximum peoplenot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail4 gal. (15 l) optional
Holding tank capacity - Detail28 gal. (106 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters15.14
Holding tank capacity - Liters105.99
Holding tank capacity - Gal4
Holding tank capacity - Gal28
Headroomnot available
Headroom6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m)

Larson Cabrio 220 2009 vs Larson Cabrio 290 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 or the Larson Cabrio 290 2008?
The Larson Cabrio 290 2008 is the longer of the two at 27,0 feet overall. The Larson Cabrio 220 2009 comes in at 22,0 feet, making it roughly 5,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 or the Larson Cabrio 290 2008?
For trailering, the Larson Cabrio 290 2008 has the edge at 9 lbs dry weight versus 42 lbs for the Larson Cabrio 220 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson Cabrio 290 2008 has a documented max rating of 320 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many passengers can the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 carry?
The Larson Cabrio 220 2009 has an official capacity rating of 1 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson Cabrio 290 2008 measures 114" wide, compared to 101" for the Larson Cabrio 220 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 or the Larson Cabrio 290 2008?
The Larson Cabrio 220 2009 has the bigger tank at 6 gallons, versus 1 gallons on the Larson Cabrio 290 2008. That 5-gallon difference translates to roughly 15–25 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 and Larson Cabrio 290 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson Cabrio 220 2009 and the Larson Cabrio 290 2008 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.