Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 boat specs
Larson
Larson 310 Cabrio 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Larson Cabrio 240  2011 boat specs
Larson
Larson Cabrio 240 2011
2011
View full specs →

Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 vs Larson Cabrio 240 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 against a deep vee Larson Cabrio 240 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 measures 31,0 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 6,4 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson Cabrio 240 2011 at 24,6 feet (2011). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson Cabrio 240 2011 tips the scales at 575 lbs — 471 lbs less than the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 at 104 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 320 hp for the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 and 320 hp for the Larson Cabrio 240 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson Cabrio 240 2011 carries 84 gallons versus 16 gallons in the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Bottom line: The Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 at 31,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Larson Cabrio 240 2011 at 24,6 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model310 Cabrio
ModelCabrio 24
Model Year201
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam10 ft. 6 in. (3.2 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters3.2
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches126
Beam - Inches102
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 9 ft. 4 in. (2.84 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail7 ft. 7 in. (2.35 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.84
Bridge clearance - Meters2.31
Bridge clearance - Inches112
Bridge clearance - Inches91
Deadrise20℃
Deadrise20°
Draft [max] - Detail34 in. (86.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (88.9 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches34
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail10,400 lbs. (4,717 kg)
Weight - Detail5,750 lbs. (2,606 kg)
Weight - kg4717.36
Weight - kg2608.15
Weight - lbs.104
Weight - lbs.575
Length - Feet31
Length - Feet24.58
Length [over all with swim platform]With Pulpit: 31 ft. 0 in. (9.44 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail24 ft. 7 in. (7.53 m) with pulpit
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters7.49
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches295
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail160 gal. (606 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail84 gal. (318 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters605.67
Fuel tank capacity - Liters317.97
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Fuel tank capacity - Gal84
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Drive typeI/O
Engine max320 hp
Engine max320 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMerCruiser 5.0L MPI BIII
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower260 hp
Operational Info
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Headroom6 ft. 1 in. (1.86 m) in cabin
Water capacity46 gal. (174 l) Waste: 37 gal. (140 l)
Water capacity19 gal. (72 l)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity2,500 lbs. (1,134 kg)
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people8 or 1,320 lbs. (599 kg)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail12 gal. (45 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters45.42
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal12

Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 vs Larson Cabrio 240 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 or the Larson Cabrio 240 2011?
The Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 is the longer of the two at 31,0 feet overall. The Larson Cabrio 240 2011 comes in at 24,6 feet, making it roughly 6,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 or the Larson Cabrio 240 2011?
For trailering, the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 has the edge at 104 lbs dry weight versus 575 lbs for the Larson Cabrio 240 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many passengers can the Larson Cabrio 240 2011 carry?
The Larson Cabrio 240 2011 has an official capacity rating of 8 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 measures 126" wide, compared to 102" for the Larson Cabrio 240 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 or the Larson Cabrio 240 2011?
The Larson Cabrio 240 2011 has the bigger tank at 84 gallons, versus 16 gallons on the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010. That 68-gallon difference translates to roughly 204–340 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 and Larson Cabrio 240 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson 310 Cabrio 2010 and the Larson Cabrio 240 2011 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.