Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 boat specs
Larson
Larson 274 Cabrio 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Larson Cabrio 857 2012 boat specs
Larson
Larson Cabrio 857 2012
2012
View full specs →

Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 vs Larson Cabrio 857 2012: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 is a modified-V design and the Larson Cabrio 857 2012 is a deep-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 at 28,0 ft versus Larson Cabrio 857 2012 at 28,1 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson Cabrio 857 2012 tips the scales at 6 650 lbs - 650 lbs less than the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 at 6 000 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 375 hp, the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 has a 75-hp advantage over the Larson Cabrio 857 2012's 300-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads - 85 gal and 84 gal - so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and its 375-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Larson Cabrio 857 2012 with its 300-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model274 Cabrio
ModelCabrio 857
Model Year2010
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 10 in. (2.69 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.69
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches106
Bridge clearance - DetailWithout Arch: 7 ft. (2.13 m) With Arch: 9 ft. (2.74 m)
Bridge clearance - Detail9 ft. 2 in. (2.8 m) with arch 7 ft. 10 in. (2.39 m) without arch
Bridge clearance - Meters2.74
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Inches108
Bridge clearance - Inches110
Deadrise18℃
Deadrise20°
Draft [max] - Detail34 in. (86.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches34
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail6,000 lbs. (2,722 kg)
Weight - Detail6,650 lbs. (3,016 kg)
Weight - kg2721.55
Weight - kg3016.39
Weight - lbs.6000
Weight - lbs.6650
Length - Feet28
Length - Feet28.08
Length [over all with swim platform]With Pulpit: 28 ft. 0 in. (8.53 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 1 in. (8.57 m) with pulpit
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters8.56
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches337
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail85 gal. (322 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail84 gal. (318 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters321.76
Fuel tank capacity - Liters317.97
Fuel tank capacity - Gal85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal84
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max375 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMerCruiser (catalyst complaint) (mandatory in U.S.)
Engine modelnot available
Engine model350 Mag MPI EC BIII
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower300
Operational Info
Head1 enclosed
Headnot available
Water capacity28 gal. (106 l) Waste: 28 gal. (106 l)
Water capacity19 gal. (72 l)
Headroomnot available
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m) in cabin
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail12 gal. (45 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters45.42
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal12

Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 vs Larson Cabrio 857 2012 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 or the Larson Cabrio 857 2012?
The Larson Cabrio 857 2012 is the longer of the two at 28,1 feet overall. The Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 comes in at 28,0 feet, making it roughly 0,1 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 or the Larson Cabrio 857 2012?
For trailering, the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 has the edge at 6 000 lbs dry weight versus 6 650 lbs for the Larson Cabrio 857 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 is rated to a maximum of 375 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson Cabrio 857 2012 tops out at 300 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many passengers can the Larson Cabrio 857 2012 carry?
The Larson Cabrio 857 2012 has an official capacity rating of 8 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison - verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson Cabrio 857 2012 measures 106" wide, compared to 102" for the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and Larson Cabrio 857 2012?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads - 85 gallons and 84 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and Larson Cabrio 857 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and the Larson Cabrio 857 2012 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.