Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 boat specs
Larson
Larson 274 Cabrio 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Larson Cabrio 260 2007 boat specs
Larson
Larson Cabrio 260 2007
2007
View full specs →

Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 vs Larson Cabrio 260 2007 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and the Larson Cabrio 260 2007 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 at 28,0 ft versus Larson Cabrio 260 2007 at 26,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson Cabrio 260 2007 tips the scales at 646 lbs — 640 lbs less than the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 at 6 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 375 hp, the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 has a 55-hp advantage over the Larson Cabrio 260 2007's 320-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 85 gal and 84 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and its 375-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Larson Cabrio 260 2007 with its 320-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model274 Cabrio
ModelCabrio? 26
Model Year201
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 10 in. (2.69 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.69
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches106
Bridge clearance - DetailWithout Arch: 7 ft. (2.13 m) With Arch: 9 ft. (2.74 m)
Bridge clearance - Detailw/o Arch: 7 ft. 10 in. (2.39 m) w/Arch: 9 ft. 2 in. (2.80 m)
Bridge clearance - Meters2.74
Bridge clearance - Meters2.79
Bridge clearance - Inches108
Bridge clearance - Inches11
Deadrise18℃
Deadrise20℃
Draft [max] - Detail34 in. (86.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Inches34
Draft [max] - Inches36
Weight - Detail6,000 lbs. (2,722 kg)
Weight - Detail6,460 lbs. (2,930 kg)
Weight - kg2721.55
Weight - kg2930.2
Weight - lbs.6
Weight - lbs.646
Length - Feet28
Length - Feet26
Length [over all with swim platform]With Pulpit: 28 ft. 0 in. (8.53 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters8.12
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 6 in. (8.12 m)
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters8.08
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches318
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail85 gal. (322 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail84 gal. (318 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters321.76
Fuel tank capacity - Liters317.97
Fuel tank capacity - Gal85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal84
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeInboard/Outboard
Engine max375 hp
Engine max320 hp
Operational Info
Head1 enclosed
Headnot available
Water capacity28 gal. (106 l) Waste: 28 gal. (106 l)
Water capacitynot available
Headroomnot available
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Water heater capacitynot available
Water heater capacity19 gal. (72 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available
Holding tank capacity - Detail12 gal. (45 l)
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters45.42
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal12

Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 vs Larson Cabrio 260 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 or the Larson Cabrio 260 2007?
The Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 is the longer of the two at 28,0 feet overall. The Larson Cabrio 260 2007 comes in at 26,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 or the Larson Cabrio 260 2007?
For trailering, the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 has the edge at 6 lbs dry weight versus 646 lbs for the Larson Cabrio 260 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 is rated to a maximum of 375 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson Cabrio 260 2007 tops out at 320 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many passengers can the Larson Cabrio 260 2007 carry?
The Larson Cabrio 260 2007 has an official capacity rating of 8 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson Cabrio 260 2007 measures 106" wide, compared to 102" for the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and Larson Cabrio 260 2007?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 85 gallons and 84 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and Larson Cabrio 260 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson 274 Cabrio 2010 and the Larson Cabrio 260 2007 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.