Larson 226 Senza 2010 boat specs
Larson
Larson 226 Senza 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 160 O/B 2013
2013
View full specs →

Larson 226 Senza 2010 vs Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson 226 Senza 2010 against a deep vee Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson 226 Senza 2010 measures 22,3 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 6,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 at 16,2 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 tips the scales at 1 549 lbs — 1 164 lbs less than the Larson 226 Senza 2010 at 385 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Larson 226 Senza 2010 has a 210-hp advantage over the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson 226 Senza 2010 carries 56 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson 226 Senza 2010 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson 226 Senza 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson 226 Senza 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 22,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model226 Senza
ModelLX 160 O/B
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches88
Deadrise21°
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail36 in. (91.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.91
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Inches36
Draft [max] - Inches31
Weight - Detail3,850 lbs. (1,746 kg)
Weight - Detail1,549 lbs. (703 kg) with Mercury 90 4S
Weight - kg1746.33
Weight - kg702.61
Weight - lbs.385
Weight - lbs.1549
Length - Feet22.25
Length - Feet16.17
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 3 in. (6.78 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 2 in. (4.93 m)
Length overall - Meters6.78
Length overall - Meters4.93
Length overall - Inches267
Length overall - Inches194
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail56 gal. (212 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. (72 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters211.98
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal56
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max300 hp
Engine max90 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,800 lbs. (816 kg)
Maximum capacity1,400 lbs. (635 kg)
Maximum people11
Maximum people6
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all28 ft. 1 in. (8.56 m)
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 4 in. (6.5 m)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailLX 2200 with swing tongue

Larson 226 Senza 2010 vs Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson 226 Senza 2010 or the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013?
The Larson 226 Senza 2010 is the longer of the two at 22,3 feet overall. The Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 comes in at 16,2 feet, making it roughly 6,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson 226 Senza 2010 or the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013?
For trailering, the Larson 226 Senza 2010 has the edge at 385 lbs dry weight versus 1 549 lbs for the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Larson 226 Senza 2010 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson 226 Senza 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson 226 Senza 2010 measures 102" wide, compared to 88" for the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson 226 Senza 2010 or the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013?
The Larson 226 Senza 2010 has the bigger tank at 56 gallons, versus 19 gallons on the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013. That 37-gallon difference translates to roughly 111–185 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson 226 Senza 2010 and Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson 226 Senza 2010 and the Larson LX 160 O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.