Larson 218 LXi 2010 boat specs
Larson
Larson 218 LXi 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013
2013
View full specs →

Larson 218 LXi 2010 vs Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson 218 LXi 2010 against a deep vee Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson 218 LXi 2010 at 21,5 ft versus Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 at 20,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson 218 LXi 2010 tips the scales at 3 735 lbs — 961 lbs more than the Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 at 2 774 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 tops out at 250 hp. Engine specs for the Larson 218 LXi 2010 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 34 gal and 35 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson 218 LXi 2010 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson 218 LXi 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson 218 LXi 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 21,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model218 LXi
ModelFX 2050 SC O/B
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 3 in. (2.51 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.51
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches99
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise22°
Deadrise16°
Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (83.8 cm)
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Inches33
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail3,735 lbs. (1,690 lbs.)
Weight - Detail2,774 lbs. (1,258 kg) with Mercury 200 Verado
Weight - kg1694.17
Weight - kg1258.26
Weight - lbs.3735
Weight - lbs.2774
Length - Feet21.5
Length - Feet20.17
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 6 in. (6.55 m)
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 2 in. (6.14 m)
Length overall - Meters6.55
Length overall - Meters6.15
Length overall - Inches258
Length overall - Inches242
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail26 in. (66 cm)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters66.04
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches26
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail34 gal. (129 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (132 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters128.7
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Gal34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max250 hp (186 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,450 lbs. (658 kg)
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs. (907 kg)
Maximum people9
Maximum people7
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all27 ft. 0 in. (8.23 m)
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 4 in. (6.8 m)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailCustom color matched FX 4000 with swing tongue

Larson 218 LXi 2010 vs Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson 218 LXi 2010 or the Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013?
The Larson 218 LXi 2010 is the longer of the two at 21,5 feet overall. The Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 comes in at 20,2 feet, making it roughly 1,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson 218 LXi 2010 or the Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013?
For trailering, the Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 has the edge at 2 774 lbs dry weight versus 3 735 lbs for the Larson 218 LXi 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 has a documented max rating of 250 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson 218 LXi 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson 218 LXi 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 9 passengers, while the Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 99" for the Larson 218 LXi 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Larson 218 LXi 2010 and Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 34 gallons and 35 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Larson 218 LXi 2010 and Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson 218 LXi 2010 and the Larson FX 2050 SC O/B 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.