Larson 1850 LX 2010 boat specs
Larson
Larson 1850 LX 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013
2013
View full specs →

Larson 1850 LX 2010 vs Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson 1850 LX 2010 against a deep vee Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 measures 23,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 4,7 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson 1850 LX 2010 at 18,8 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson 1850 LX 2010 tips the scales at 2 375 lbs — 1 931 lbs more than the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 at 444 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson 1850 LX 2010 carries a rated maximum of 190 hp. Engine data for the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 carries 57 gallons versus 23 gallons in the Larson 1850 LX 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson 1850 LX 2010 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson 1850 LX 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson 1850 LX 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 18,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model1850 LX
ModelLXi 238 I/O
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise21°
Deadrise22°
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (0.79 m)
Draft [max] - Detail35 in. (88.9 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.89
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches35
Weight - Detail2,375 lbs. (1,080 kg)
Weight - Detail4,440 lbs. (2,014 kg) with base engine (5.0L)
Weight - kg1077.28
Weight - kg2013.95
Weight - lbs.2375
Weight - lbs.444
Length - Feet18.83
Length - Feet23.5
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 10 in. (5.74 m)
Length overall - Detail23 ft. 6 in. (7.16 m)
Length overall - Meters5.74
Length overall - Meters7.16
Length overall - Inches226
Length overall - Inches282
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail57 gal. (216 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters215.77
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel tank capacity - Gal57
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeI/O
Engine max190 hp
Engine maxnot available
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,150 lbs. (522 kg)
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)
Maximum people7
Maximum people1
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity12 gal. (45.4 l)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 8 in. (6.9 m)
Trailer - Length over all28 ft. 4 in. (8.63 m)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailLXi 5500 DB with swing tongue, chrome wheels & diamond plated fenders

Larson 1850 LX 2010 vs Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson 1850 LX 2010 or the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013?
The Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 is the longer of the two at 23,5 feet overall. The Larson 1850 LX 2010 comes in at 18,8 feet, making it roughly 4,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson 1850 LX 2010 or the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013?
For trailering, the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 has the edge at 444 lbs dry weight versus 2 375 lbs for the Larson 1850 LX 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson 1850 LX 2010 has a documented max rating of 190 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson 1850 LX 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 88" for the Larson 1850 LX 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson 1850 LX 2010 or the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013?
The Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 has the bigger tank at 57 gallons, versus 23 gallons on the Larson 1850 LX 2010. That 34-gallon difference translates to roughly 102–170 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson 1850 LX 2010 and Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson 1850 LX 2010 and the Larson LXi 238 I/O 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.