Matching a modified vee Larson 1750 LX 2010 against a deep vee Larson LSR 2000 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Larson 1750 LX 2010 at 17,1 ft versus Larson LSR 2000 2013 at 20,1 ft. At 204 lbs and 245 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The Larson 1750 LX 2010 carries a rated maximum of 150 hp. Engine data for the Larson LSR 2000 2013 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson 1750 LX 2010 carries 23 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Larson LSR 2000 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson LSR 2000 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson 1750 LX 2010 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson LSR 2000 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Larson LSR 2000 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 20,1 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson 1750 LX 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.