Larson 1750 LX 2009 boat specs
Larson
Larson 1750 LX 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 boat specs
Larson
Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008
2008
View full specs →

Larson 1750 LX 2009 vs Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Larson 1750 LX 2009 and the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 measures 22,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 4,9 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson 1750 LX 2009 at 17,1 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 tips the scales at 3 495 lbs — 3 291 lbs less than the Larson 1750 LX 2009 at 204 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 tops out at 320 hp. Engine specs for the Larson 1750 LX 2009 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 carries 35 gallons versus 23 gallons in the Larson 1750 LX 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson 1750 LX 2009 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson 1750 LX 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson 1750 LX 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 17,1 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model1750 LX
ModelLXi 228 I/O
Model Year2009
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m)
Beam8 ft. 3 in. (2.5 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters2.51
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches99
Deadrise21°
Deadrise21℃
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (83.9 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches33
Weight - Detail2,040 lbs. (925 kg)
Weight - Detail3,495 lbs. (1,585 kg)
Weight - kg925.33
Weight - kg1585.3
Weight - lbs.204
Weight - lbs.3495
Length - Feet17.08
Length - Feet22
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 1 in. (5.21 m)
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 6 in. (6.88 m)
Length overall - Meters5.21
Length overall - Meters6.86
Length overall - Inches205
Length overall - Inches27
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters6.88
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (132.5 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeInboard/Outboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max320 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)
Maximum people7
Maximum people1
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detail2,400 lb. capacity with brakes; standard black
Trailer - Detailnot available

Larson 1750 LX 2009 vs Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson 1750 LX 2009 or the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008?
The Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The Larson 1750 LX 2009 comes in at 17,1 feet, making it roughly 4,9 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson 1750 LX 2009 or the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008?
For trailering, the Larson 1750 LX 2009 has the edge at 204 lbs dry weight versus 3 495 lbs for the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 has a documented max rating of 320 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson 1750 LX 2009 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson 1750 LX 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 is certified for 1. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 measures 99" wide, compared to 88" for the Larson 1750 LX 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson 1750 LX 2009 or the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008?
The Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 has the bigger tank at 35 gallons, versus 23 gallons on the Larson 1750 LX 2009. That 12-gallon difference translates to roughly 36–60 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson 1750 LX 2009 and Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson 1750 LX 2009 and the Larson LXi 228 I/O 2008 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.