Larson 1750 LX 2009 boat specs
Larson
Larson 1750 LX 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 boat specs
Larson
Larson 330 Cabrio 2010
2010
View full specs →

Larson 1750 LX 2009 vs Larson 330 Cabrio 2010: Which Modified-V Boat Fits Your Needs?

Both the Larson 1750 LX 2009 and the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 are modified-V designs, both built in fibreglass, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 measures 32,0 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 14,9 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson 1750 LX 2009 at 17,1 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 tips the scales at 11 400 lbs - 9 360 lbs less than the Larson 1750 LX 2009 at 2 040 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 tops out at 320 hp. Engine specs for the Larson 1750 LX 2009 aren't listed - confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 carries 240 gallons versus 23 gallons in the Larson 1750 LX 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

The Larson 1750 LX 2009 is rated for up to 7 people. Passenger data for the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 wasn't available.

Bottom line: The Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 at 32,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Larson 1750 LX 2009 at 17,1 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking - a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model1750 LX
Model330 Cabrio
Model Year2009
Model Year2010
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m)
Beam11 ft. 6 in. (3.51 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters3.51
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches138
Deadrise21°
Deadrise18℃
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (79 cm)
Draft [max] - Detail34 in. (86.4 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.86
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches34
Weight - Detail2,040 lbs. (925 kg)
Weight - Detail11,400 lbs. (5,171 kg)
Weight - kg925.33
Weight - kg5170.95
Weight - lbs.2040
Weight - lbs.11400
Length - Feet17.08
Length - Feet32
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 1 in. (5.21 m)
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Meters5.21
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Inches205
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Detailnot available
Bridge clearance - DetailWith Arch: 9 ft. 4 in. (2.84 m)
Bridge clearance - Metersnot available
Bridge clearance - Meters2.84
Bridge clearance - Inchesnot available
Bridge clearance - Inches112
Length [over all with swim platform]not available
Length [over all with swim platform]With Pulpit: 32 ft. 0 in. (9.75 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail240 gal. (908 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters908.5
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel tank capacity - Gal240
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Fuel typeGas or Diesel
Drive typenot available
Drive typeI/O - Twin
Engine maxnot available
Engine max320 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people7
Maximum peoplenot available
Headroomnot available
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity46 gal. (174 l) Waste: 37 gal. (140 l)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detail2,400 lb. capacity with brakes; standard black
Trailer - Detailnot available

Larson 1750 LX 2009 vs Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Larson 1750 LX 2009 or the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010?
The Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 is the longer of the two at 32,0 feet overall. The Larson 1750 LX 2009 comes in at 17,1 feet, making it roughly 14,9 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Larson 1750 LX 2009 or the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010?
For trailering, the Larson 1750 LX 2009 has the edge at 2 040 lbs dry weight versus 11 400 lbs for the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 has a documented max rating of 320 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson 1750 LX 2009 were not available in our database - check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many passengers can the Larson 1750 LX 2009 carry?
The Larson 1750 LX 2009 has an official capacity rating of 7 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison - verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 measures 138" wide, compared to 88" for the Larson 1750 LX 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Larson 1750 LX 2009 or the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010?
The Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 has the bigger tank at 240 gallons, versus 23 gallons on the Larson 1750 LX 2009. That 217-gallon difference translates to roughly 651–1085 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson 1750 LX 2009 and Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Larson 1750 LX 2009 and the Larson 330 Cabrio 2010 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.