Larson 1700 LX 2010 boat specs
Larson
Larson 1700 LX 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 boat specs
Larson
Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013
2013
View full specs →

Larson 1700 LX 2010 vs Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Larson 1700 LX 2010 against a deep vee Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 measures 20,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 3,6 additional feet of deck space compared to the Larson 1700 LX 2010 at 16,9 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 tips the scales at 309 lbs — 144 lbs less than the Larson 1700 LX 2010 at 165 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Larson 1700 LX 2010 carries a rated maximum of 115 hp. Engine data for the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Larson 1700 LX 2010 carries 23 gallons versus 3 gallons in the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Larson 1700 LX 2010 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 20,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Larson 1700 LX 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLarson
MakeLarson
Model1700 LX
ModelLX 216 S Cuddy
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 4 in. (2.24 m)
Beam8 ft. 3 in. (2.5 m)
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Meters2.51
Beam - Inches88
Beam - Inches99
Deadrise21°
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail31 in. (0.79 m)
Draft [max] - Detail33 in. (84 cm)
Draft [max] - Meters0.79
Draft [max] - Meters0.84
Draft [max] - Inches31
Draft [max] - Inches33
Weight - Detail1,650 lbs. (750 kg)
Weight - Detail3,090 lbs. (1,380 kg) with base engine (4.3L)
Weight - kg748.43
Weight - kg1401.6
Weight - lbs.165
Weight - lbs.309
Length - Feet16.92
Length - Feet20.5
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 11 in. (5.15 m)
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in. (6.25 m)
Length overall - Meters5.16
Length overall - Meters6.25
Length overall - Inches203
Length overall - Inches246
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialComposite
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail23 gal. (87 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail30 gal. (114 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters87.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters113.56
Fuel tank capacity - Gal23
Fuel tank capacity - Gal3
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeI/O
Engine max115 hp
Engine maxnot available
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,750 lbs. (793.8 kg)
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs. (680 kg)
Maximum people7 or 1,100 lbs
Maximum people8
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 4 in. (6.5 m)
Trailer - Length over all26 ft. 9 in. (8.15 m)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailLX 4600 DB with swing tongue

Larson 1700 LX 2010 vs Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Larson 1700 LX 2010 or the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013?
The Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,5 feet overall. The Larson 1700 LX 2010 comes in at 16,9 feet, making it roughly 3,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Larson 1700 LX 2010 or the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013?
For trailering, the Larson 1700 LX 2010 has the edge at 165 lbs dry weight versus 309 lbs for the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Larson 1700 LX 2010 has a documented max rating of 115 hp. Engine specifications for the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Larson 1700 LX 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 measures 99" wide, compared to 88" for the Larson 1700 LX 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Larson 1700 LX 2010 or the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013?
The Larson 1700 LX 2010 has the bigger tank at 23 gallons, versus 3 gallons on the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013. That 20-gallon difference translates to roughly 60–100 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Larson 1700 LX 2010 and Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Larson 1700 LX 2010 and the Larson LX 216 S Cuddy 2013 are built by Larson. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.