Landau A'Lure 204 2007 boat specs
Landau
Landau A'Lure 204 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 boat specs
Landau
Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013
2013
View full specs →

Landau A'Lure 204 2007 vs Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 — A Close Look at Two Pontoons

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 and the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 are pontoon designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Landau A'Lure 204 2007 at 2,0 ft versus Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 at 2,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 tips the scales at 1 743 lbs — 318 lbs less than the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 at 1 425 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 and 90 hp for the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Landau A'Lure 204 2007 comes in at 16 lbs per hp versus 19 lbs per hp for the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Both are 2-tube and 23-tube pontoon designs respectively. Tube diameter and gauge affect stability and load capacity — more so than most buyers realize when comparing on paper.

Bottom line: Choose the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Landau A'Lure 204 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLandau
MakeLandau
ModelA'Lure 204
ModelA'lure Fishing 212
Model Year2007
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail1,365 (1,425 with tri-log)
Weight - Detail1,580 lbs. 2-tube 1,743 lbs. 3-tube
Weight - kg646.37
Weight - kg790.61
Weight - lbs.1425
Weight - lbs.1743
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet2
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft
Length overall - Meters6.1
Length overall - Meters6.1
Length overall - Inches24
Length overall - Inches24
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typePontoon
Hull typePontoon
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter25 in
Tube diameter21 x 25 in
Tube gauge0.080 in
Tube gaugenot available
Number of tubes2
Number of tubes2 or 3
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp (140 hp with tri-log)
Engine max90 hp 2-log 130 hp 3-log
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail26 gal. 2-tube 33 gal. 3-tube
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters124.92
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal33
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,850 lbs
Maximum capacity1,570 lbs. 2-tube 2,295 lbs. 3-tube
Maximum people1
Maximum people8 / 2-tube 11 / 3-tube

Landau A'Lure 204 2007 vs Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 or the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013?
The Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 is the longer of the two at 2,0 feet overall. The Landau A'Lure 204 2007 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 0,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 or the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013?
For trailering, the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 has the edge at 1 425 lbs dry weight versus 1 743 lbs for the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Landau A'Lure 204 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 1 passengers, while the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Landau A'Lure 204 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 16 lbs per hp compared to 19 lbs per hp for the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Landau A'Lure 204 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 and Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Landau A'Lure 204 2007 and the Landau A'lure Fishing 212 2013 are built by Landau. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.