Lagoon 410 1997 boat specs
Lagoon
Lagoon 410 1997
1997
View full specs →
VS
Lagoon 620 2009 boat specs
Lagoon
Lagoon 620 2009
2009
View full specs →

Lagoon 410 1997 vs Lagoon 620 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lagoon 410 1997 vs Lagoon 620 2009 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lagoon 620 2009 measures 62,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 21,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lagoon 410 1997 at 40,7 feet (1997). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lagoon 620 2009 tips the scales at 71 077 lbs — 55 116 lbs less than the Lagoon 410 1997 at 15 961 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 110 hp, the Lagoon 620 2009 has a 83-hp advantage over the Lagoon 410 1997's 27-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lagoon 620 2009 carries 343 gallons versus 53 gallons in the Lagoon 410 1997. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lagoon 620 2009 is rated for 18 passengers, while the Lagoon 410 1997 caps at 12. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lagoon 620 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Lagoon 620 2009 displaces 71 077 lbs — a 55 116-lb difference over the Lagoon 410 1997 at 15 961 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Lagoon 620 2009 draws 5,1 ft, compared to 3,1 ft for the Lagoon 410 1997. That 2,0-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Lagoon 410 1997 is rigged as a fractional_rig_sloop while the Lagoon 620 2009 carries Fractional Sloop rigging — a meaningful difference in sail handling complexity, upwind performance, and the size of crew you'll need to work the boat comfortably. Helm style differs too: the Lagoon 410 1997 uses a Single helm wheel versus a Twin helm wheels on the Lagoon 620 2009. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones. For auxiliary power the Lagoon 620 2009 carries a 110-hp engine against 27 hp on the Lagoon 410 1997. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

Bottom line: The Lagoon 620 2009 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 71 077 lbs displacement and 62 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Lagoon 410 1997 at 15 961 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail40.70 ft
Length overall - Detail62.00 ft
Length - Feet40.7
Length - Feet62
Length overall - Meters12.41
Length overall - Meters18.9
Length overall - Inches488
Length overall - Inches744
Beam23.40 ft
Beam32.10 ft
Beam - Meters7.13
Beam - Meters9.78
Beam - Inches281
Beam - Inches385
Draft [max] - Detail3.11 ft
Draft [max] - Detail5.10 ft
Draft [max] - Meters0.95
Draft [max] - Meters1.55
Draft [max] - Inches37
Draft [max] - Inches61
Displacement15961.00 lbs
Displacement71077.00 lbs
Body / Hull
RudderTwin spade rudders
RudderTwin spade rudders
HelmSingle helm wheel
HelmTwin helm wheels
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal52.8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal343.4
Fuel tank capacity - Liters199.87
Fuel tank capacity - Liters1299.91
Horsepower27 hp
Horsepower110 hp
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Engine 2 Horsepower27 hp
Engine 2 Horsepower110 hp
Engine 2 Fuel TypeDiesel
Engine 2 Fuel TypeDiesel
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Engine 2 Drive Typeinboard
Operational Info
Sleeping capacity8
Sleeping capacity14
Cabins4
Cabins6
Head4
Head5
Riggingfractional_rig_sloop
RiggingFractional Sloop
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail
Water capacitynot available
Water capacity253.6
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal77.1
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters291.86

Lagoon 410 1997 vs Lagoon 620 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lagoon 410 1997 or the Lagoon 620 2009?
The Lagoon 620 2009 is the longer of the two at 62,0 feet overall. The Lagoon 410 1997 comes in at 40,7 feet, making it roughly 21,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lagoon 410 1997 or the Lagoon 620 2009?
For trailering, the Lagoon 410 1997 has the edge at 15 961 lbs dry weight versus 71 077 lbs for the Lagoon 620 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lagoon 620 2009 is rated to a maximum of 110 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lagoon 410 1997 tops out at 27 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lagoon 410 1997 is Coast Guard rated for 12 passengers, while the Lagoon 620 2009 is certified for 18. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Lagoon 410 1997 or the Lagoon 620 2009?
The Lagoon 620 2009 has the deeper draft at 5,1 ft, versus 3,1 ft for the Lagoon 410 1997. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Lagoon 410 1997 or the Lagoon 620 2009 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Lagoon 620 2009 at 71 077 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Lagoon 410 1997 at 15 961 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lagoon 620 2009 measures 385" wide, compared to 281" for the Lagoon 410 1997. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lagoon 410 1997 or the Lagoon 620 2009?
The Lagoon 620 2009 has the bigger tank at 343 gallons, versus 53 gallons on the Lagoon 410 1997. That 290-gallon difference translates to roughly 871–1452 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lagoon 410 1997 and Lagoon 620 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lagoon 410 1997 and the Lagoon 620 2009 are built by Lagoon. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.