Matching a modified vee Klamath 16 ft. EXW 2006 against a deep vee Klamath 23 ft. Baja 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Klamath 23 ft. Baja 2013 measures 23,1 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 7,1 additional feet of deck space compared to the Klamath 16 ft. EXW 2006 at 16,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Klamath 16 ft. EXW 2006 tips the scales at 535 lbs — 390 lbs more than the Klamath 23 ft. Baja 2013 at 145 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Klamath 23 ft. Baja 2013 has a 110-hp advantage over the Klamath 16 ft. EXW 2006's 65-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Klamath 23 ft. Baja 2013 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Klamath 16 ft. EXW 2006 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Klamath 23 ft. Baja 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Klamath 23 ft. Baja 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 23,1 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Klamath 16 ft. EXW 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.