Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 boat specs
Klamath
Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 boat specs
Klamath
Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008
2008
View full specs →

Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 vs Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 and the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 at 13,0 ft versus Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 tips the scales at 535 lbs — 310 lbs less than the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 at 225 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 65 hp, the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 has a 45-hp advantage over the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010's 20-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 comes in at 8 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeKlamath
MakeKlamath
Model13 Jac Wide
Model16 ft. AKW
Model Year201
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam67 in
Beam77 in
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Meters1.96
Beam - Inches67
Beam - Inches77
Depth - DetailBow: 20 in. Midship: 19 in. Transom: 21 in
Depth - DetailBow: 42 in. Midship: 28 in. Transom: 25 in
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimeters106.68
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inches42
Weight - Detail225 lbs
Weight - Detail535 lbs
Weight - kg102.06
Weight - kg242.67
Weight - lbs.225
Weight - lbs.535
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet13
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail13 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters3.96
Length overall - Meters4.9
Length overall - Inches156
Length overall - Inches193
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise7° at transom
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thicknessBottom: 0.063 in
Hull thicknessSides: 0.063 in. Bottom: 0.080 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max20 hp
Engine max65 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity800 lbs
Maximum capacity1,315 lbs
Maximum people4
Maximum people7

Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 vs Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 or the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008?
The Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 comes in at 13,0 feet, making it roughly 3,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 or the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008?
For trailering, the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 has the edge at 225 lbs dry weight versus 535 lbs for the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 is rated to a maximum of 65 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 tops out at 20 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 8 lbs per hp compared to 11 lbs per hp for the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 measures 77" wide, compared to 67" for the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 and Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Klamath 13 Jac Wide 2010 and the Klamath 16 ft. AKW 2008 are built by Klamath. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.