Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 boat specs
Kirie
Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986
1986
View full specs →
VS
Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 boat specs
Kirie
Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987
1987
View full specs →

Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 vs Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 vs Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 measures 36,5 feet overall (1986), giving it roughly 3,9 additional feet of deck space compared to the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 at 32,6 feet (1987). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 tips the scales at 10 803 lbs — 1 059 lbs more than the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 at 9 744 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 28 hp for the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 and 28 hp for the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 32 gal and 30 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 caps at 9. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 could be the deciding factor.

Both boats sit in a similar displacement bracket — 10 803 lbs for the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 and 9 744 lbs for the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987. Comparable displacement means broadly similar seakeeping behaviour and load capacity, though hull form and ballast ratio will still produce noticeably different sailing characteristics.

Both boats draw a similar depth — 4,7 ft and 5,2 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.

The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 uses Sloop rigging. Helm style differs too: the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 uses a 1 wheel versus a 1 tiller (helm wheel in option) on the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones.

Hull speed is rated at 7,2 knots for the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 and 7,0 knots for the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987. For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 carries 63 gallons versus 50 gallons on the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.

Bottom line: The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 at 36,5 ft offers more living space, greater range, and a more substantial offshore capability. The Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 at 32,6 ft is the easier, lower-cost option — simpler to crew and a strong choice for coastal and day sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail36.50 ft
Length overall - Detail32.60 ft
Length - Feet36.5
Length - Feet32.6
Length overall - Meters11.13
Length overall - Meters9.94
Length overall - Inches438
Length overall - Inches391
Beam11.10 ft
Beam11.10 ft
Beam - Meters3.38
Beam - Meters3.38
Beam - Inches133
Beam - Inches133
Draft [max] - Detail4.70 ft
Draft [max] - Detail5.20 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.43
Draft [max] - Meters1.58
Draft [max] - Inches56
Draft [max] - Inches62
Displacement10803.00 lbs
Displacement9744.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder1 spade rudder
Rudder1 spade rudder
Helm1 wheel
Helm1 tiller (helm wheel in option)
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal31.7
Fuel tank capacity - Gal30.4
Fuel tank capacity - Liters120
Fuel tank capacity - Liters115.08
Horsepower28 hp
Horsepower28 hp
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeinboard
Performance
Maximum speed7.2
Maximum speed6.98
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Water capacity63.4
Water capacity50.2
RiggingSloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail

Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 vs Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 or the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987?
The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 is the longer of the two at 36,5 feet overall. The Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 comes in at 32,6 feet, making it roughly 3,9 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 or the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987?
For trailering, the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 has the edge at 9 744 lbs dry weight versus 10 803 lbs for the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 or the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987?
The Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 has the deeper draft at 5,2 ft, versus 4,7 ft for the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 or the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 at 10 803 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 at 9 744 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 or the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987?
Based on rated hull speed, the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 has an edge at 7,2 knots versus 7,0 knots for the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is better equipped for long-distance cruising?
For extended passages, fresh water capacity is a key indicator of cruising readiness. The Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 carries 63 gallons of fresh water compared to 50 gallons on the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 — a meaningful advantage when watermaker installations or port stops aren't guaranteed.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 and Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 share an 11.10 ft beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 and Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 32 gallons and 30 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 and Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Kirie Feeling 1090 - Shoal draft Shoal draft 1986 and the Kirie Feeling 326 - Centerboard (Trunk) Centerboard (Trunk) 1987 are built by Kirie. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.