Kingfisher 2825 2009 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 2825 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Kingfisher 3050 2010 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 3050 2010
2010
View full specs →

Kingfisher 2825 2009 vs Kingfisher 3050 2010 — Which Deep Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Kingfisher 2825 2009 and the Kingfisher 3050 2010 are deep vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Kingfisher 2825 2009 measures 28,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 25,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Kingfisher 3050 2010 at 3,0 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 2825 2009 tips the scales at 5 044 lbs — 4 289 lbs more than the Kingfisher 3050 2010 at 755 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Kingfisher 2825 2009 carries a rated maximum of 450 hp. Engine data for the Kingfisher 3050 2010 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 16 gal and 16 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Kingfisher 3050 2010 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Kingfisher 2825 2009 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Kingfisher 3050 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Kingfisher 3050 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 3,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Kingfisher 2825 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeKingfisher
MakeKingfisher
Model2825
Model305
Model Year2009
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam9 ft. 6 in
Beam9 ft. 5 in. (2.9 m)
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Meters2.87
Beam - Inches114
Beam - Inches113
Deadrise18℃
Deadrise18℃
Weight - Detail5,044 lbs
Weight - Detail7,550 lbs. (3,425 kg)
Weight - kg2287.92
Weight - kg3424.62
Weight - lbs.5044
Weight - lbs.755
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 90 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 90 in. (2.29 m)
Height - DetailSides: 42 in
Height - DetailSides: 42 in. (107 cm)
Height - Meters1.07
Height - Meters1.07
Height - Inches42
Height - Inches42
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet28
Length - Feet3
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail28 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Detail30 ft. 0 in. (9.14 m)
Length overall - Meters8.66
Length overall - Meters9.14
Length overall - Inches341
Length overall - Inches36
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.16
Hull thicknessSide: 0.16 in. (4.1 mm)
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail160 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail160 gal. (606 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters605.67
Fuel tank capacity - Liters605.67
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Fuel tank capacity - Gal16
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Drive typeInboard
Engine max450 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardVolvo D4-300 EVC
Operational Info
HeadEnclosed
HeadEnclosed
Headroom6 ft. 5.5 in
Headroom6 ft. 5.5 in. (1.97 m)
Water capacity40 gal
Water capacity40 gal
Holding tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Holding tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Holding tank capacity - Liters151.42
Holding tank capacity - Liters151.42
Holding tank capacity - Gal4
Holding tank capacity - Gal4

Kingfisher 2825 2009 vs Kingfisher 3050 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Kingfisher 2825 2009 or the Kingfisher 3050 2010?
The Kingfisher 2825 2009 is the longer of the two at 28,0 feet overall. The Kingfisher 3050 2010 comes in at 3,0 feet, making it roughly 25,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Kingfisher 2825 2009 or the Kingfisher 3050 2010?
For trailering, the Kingfisher 3050 2010 has the edge at 755 lbs dry weight versus 5 044 lbs for the Kingfisher 2825 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Kingfisher 2825 2009 has a documented max rating of 450 hp. Engine specifications for the Kingfisher 3050 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Kingfisher 2825 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Kingfisher 3050 2010 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Kingfisher 2825 2009 measures 114" wide, compared to 113" for the Kingfisher 3050 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Kingfisher 2825 2009 and Kingfisher 3050 2010?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 16 gallons and 16 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Kingfisher 2825 2009 and Kingfisher 3050 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Kingfisher 2825 2009 and the Kingfisher 3050 2010 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.