Kingfisher 2425 2012 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 2425 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Kingfisher 2525 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 2525 2013
2013
View full specs →

Kingfisher 2425 2012 vs Kingfisher 2525 2013 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Kingfisher 2425 2012 and the Kingfisher 2525 2013 are deep vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Kingfisher 2425 2012 at 24,5 ft versus Kingfisher 2525 2013 at 25,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 2525 2013 tips the scales at 4 383 lbs — 4 351 lbs less than the Kingfisher 2425 2012 at 32 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 230 hp for the Kingfisher 2425 2012 and 250 hp for the Kingfisher 2525 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 125 gal and 125 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 7 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Kingfisher 2525 2013 and its 250-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Kingfisher 2425 2012 with its 230-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeKingfisher
MakeKingfisher
Model2425
Model2525
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
DeadriseVariable 18℃
DeadriseVariable 18℃
Weight - Detail3,200 lbs. (1,451 kg)
Weight - Detail4,383 lbs. (1,988 kg)
Weight - kg1451.49
Weight - kg1988.09
Weight - lbs.32
Weight - lbs.4383
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 82 in. (2.08 m)
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 82 in. (2.08 m)
Height - DetailSides: 38 in. (97 cm)
Height - DetailSides: 38 in. (97 cm)
Height - Meters0.97
Height - Meters0.97
Height - Inches38
Height - Inches38
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Length - Feet24.5
Length - Feet25.83
Length overall - Detail24 ft. 6 in. (7.46 m)
Length overall - Detail25 ft. 10 in. (7.65 m)
Length overall - Meters7.47
Length overall - Meters7.87
Length overall - Inches294
Length overall - Inches31
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 in. (3.2 mm) Bottom: 0.19 in. (4.8 mm)
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 in. (3.2 mm) Bottom: 0.25 in. (6.4 mm)
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail125 gal. (473 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail125 gal. (473 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters473.18
Fuel tank capacity - Liters473.18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal125
Fuel tank capacity - Gal125
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max230 hp
Engine max250 hp
Operational Info
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader 7,500 lbs. factory matched galvanized tandem axle bunk trailer with custom tie down straps
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader tandem axle bunk
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight7,500 lbs

Kingfisher 2425 2012 vs Kingfisher 2525 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Kingfisher 2425 2012 or the Kingfisher 2525 2013?
The Kingfisher 2525 2013 is the longer of the two at 25,8 feet overall. The Kingfisher 2425 2012 comes in at 24,5 feet, making it roughly 1,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Kingfisher 2425 2012 or the Kingfisher 2525 2013?
For trailering, the Kingfisher 2425 2012 has the edge at 32 lbs dry weight versus 4 383 lbs for the Kingfisher 2525 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Kingfisher 2525 2013 is rated to a maximum of 250 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Kingfisher 2425 2012 tops out at 230 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Kingfisher 2425 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Kingfisher 2525 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Kingfisher 2425 2012 and Kingfisher 2525 2013 share an 8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Kingfisher 2425 2012 and Kingfisher 2525 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 125 gallons and 125 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Kingfisher 2425 2012 and Kingfisher 2525 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Kingfisher 2425 2012 and the Kingfisher 2525 2013 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.