Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Kingfisher 2525 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 2525 2013
2013
View full specs →

Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 vs Kingfisher 2525 2013: A Close Look at Two Deep-V Boats

Both the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 and the Kingfisher 2525 2013 are deep-V designs, both built in aluminium, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 at 24,2 ft versus Kingfisher 2525 2013 at 25,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 2525 2013 tips the scales at 4 383 lbs - 1 433 lbs less than the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 at 2 950 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling - 250 hp for the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 and 250 hp for the Kingfisher 2525 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Kingfisher 2525 2013 carries 125 gallons versus 70 gallons in the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 7 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 and Kingfisher 2525 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeKingfisher
MakeKingfisher
Model2425 Experience HT
Model2525
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam102 in. (2.59 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches102
Deadrise18° variable
DeadriseVariable 18℃
Weight - Detail2,950 lbs. (1,340 kg)
Weight - Detail4,383 lbs. (1,988 kg)
Weight - kg1338.1
Weight - kg1988.09
Weight - lbs.2950
Weight - lbs.4383
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 84 in. (2.13 m)
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 82 in. (2.08 m)
Height - DetailSide: 37 in. (94 cm)
Height - DetailSides: 38 in. (97 cm)
Height - Meters0.94
Height - Meters0.97
Height - Inches37
Height - Inches38
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Length - Feet24.17
Length - Feet25.83
Length overall - Detail24 ft. 2 in. (6.76 m)
Length overall - Detail25 ft. 10 in. (7.65 m)
Length overall - Meters7.37
Length overall - Meters7.87
Length overall - Inches290
Length overall - Inches310
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 in. (3.2 mm) Bottom: 0.19 in. (4.8 mm)
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 in. (3.2 mm) Bottom: 0.25 in. (6.4 mm)
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail70 gal. (265 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail125 gal. (473 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters264.98
Fuel tank capacity - Liters473.18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal70
Fuel tank capacity - Gal125
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max250 hp
Engine max250 hp
Operational Info
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Headroom6 ft. 3 in. (1.91 m)
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader tandem axle bunk
Trailer - Weight4,700 lbs.
Trailer - Weight7,500 lbs.

Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 vs Kingfisher 2525 2013 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 or the Kingfisher 2525 2013?
The Kingfisher 2525 2013 is the longer of the two at 25,8 feet overall. The Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 comes in at 24,2 feet, making it roughly 1,7 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 or the Kingfisher 2525 2013?
For trailering, the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 has the edge at 2 950 lbs dry weight versus 4 383 lbs for the Kingfisher 2525 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Kingfisher 2525 2013 is certified for 7. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 and Kingfisher 2525 2013 share an 102 in. (2.59 m) beam - meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 or the Kingfisher 2525 2013?
The Kingfisher 2525 2013 has the bigger tank at 125 gallons, versus 70 gallons on the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013. That 55-gallon difference translates to roughly 165–275 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 and Kingfisher 2525 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Kingfisher 2425 Experience HT 2013 and the Kingfisher 2525 2013 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.