Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 vs Kingfisher 3050 2010 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is the larger boat — the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 or the Kingfisher 3050 2010?

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Kingfisher 3050 2010 comes in at 3,0 feet, making it roughly 15,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 or the Kingfisher 3050 2010?

For trailering, the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 has the edge at 181 lbs dry weight versus 755 lbs for the Kingfisher 3050 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 has a documented max rating of 200 hp. Engine specifications for the Kingfisher 3050 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Kingfisher 3050 2010 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Kingfisher 3050 2010 measures 113" wide, compared to 88" for the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 or the Kingfisher 3050 2010?

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 has the bigger tank at 36 gallons, versus 16 gallons on the Kingfisher 3050 2010. That 20-gallon difference translates to roughly 60–100 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Q: Are the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 and Kingfisher 3050 2010 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 and the Kingfisher 3050 2010 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 vs Kingfisher 3050 2010

Kingfisher

Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013

2013

View full specs →

Kingfisher

Kingfisher 3050 2010

2010

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 vs Kingfisher 3050 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a tunnel Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 against a deep vee Kingfisher 3050 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 measures 18,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 15,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Kingfisher 3050 2010 at 3,0 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 3050 2010 tips the scales at 755 lbs — 574 lbs less than the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 at 181 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 carries a rated maximum of 200 hp. Engine data for the Kingfisher 3050 2010 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 carries 36 gallons versus 16 gallons in the Kingfisher 3050 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Kingfisher 3050 2010 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Kingfisher 3050 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Kingfisher 3050 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 3,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeKingfisher

Model1875 Extreme Shallow CC

Model305

Model Year2013

Model Year201

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam88 in. (2.24 m)

Beam9 ft. 5 in. (2.9 m)

Beam - Meters2.24

Beam - Meters2.87

Beam - Inches88

Beam - Inches113

Deadrise8° constant

Deadrise18℃

Weight - Detail1,810 lbs. (820 kg)

Weight - Detail7,550 lbs. (3,425 kg)

Weight - kg821

Weight - kg3424.62

Weight - lbs.181

Weight - lbs.755

Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in. (1.68 m)

Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 90 in. (2.29 m)

Height - DetailSides: 28 in. (71 cm)

Height - DetailSides: 42 in. (107 cm)

Height - Meters0.71

Height - Meters1.07

Height - Inches28

Height - Inches42

Length - Feet18

Length - Feet3

Length overall - Detail18 ft. (5.5 m)

Length overall - Detail30 ft. 0 in. (9.14 m)

Length overall - Meters5.49

Length overall - Meters9.14

Length overall - Inches216

Length overall - Inches36

Body / Hull

Hull materialAluminum

Hull thicknessSide: 0.102 in. (2.6 mm) 0.190 in. (4.82 mm)

Hull thicknessSide: 0.16 in. (4.1 mm)

Hull typeTunnel

Hull typeDeep Vee

Engine and Drivetrain

Engine makeMercury

Engine makenot available

Engine modelOptimax Sport Jet

Engine modelnot available

Fuel tank capacity - Detail36 gal. (136 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Detail160 gal. (606 l)

Fuel tank capacity - Liters136.27

Fuel tank capacity - Liters605.67

Fuel tank capacity - Gal36

Fuel tank capacity - Gal16

Fuel typeGas

Fuel typeDiesel

Horsepower200 hp

Horsepowernot available

Engine/s standardnot available

Engine/s standardVolvo D4-300 EVC

Drive typenot available

Drive typeInboard

Trailer Info

Trailer - DetailEZ Loader

Trailer - Detailnot available

Trailer - Weight2,800 lbs

Trailer - Weightnot available

Operational Info

Headnot available

HeadEnclosed

Headroomnot available

Headroom6 ft. 5.5 in. (1.97 m)

Water capacitynot available

Water capacity40 gal

Holding tank capacity - Detailnot available

Holding tank capacity - Detail40 gal

Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available

Holding tank capacity - Liters151.42

Holding tank capacity - Galnot available

Holding tank capacity - Gal4

Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 vs Kingfisher 3050 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 or the Kingfisher 3050 2010?

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Kingfisher 3050 2010 comes in at 3,0 feet, making it roughly 15,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.

Which is easier to trailer — the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 or the Kingfisher 3050 2010?

For trailering, the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 has the edge at 181 lbs dry weight versus 755 lbs for the Kingfisher 3050 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 has a documented max rating of 200 hp. Engine specifications for the Kingfisher 3050 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Kingfisher 3050 2010 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Kingfisher 3050 2010 measures 113" wide, compared to 88" for the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 or the Kingfisher 3050 2010?

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 has the bigger tank at 36 gallons, versus 16 gallons on the Kingfisher 3050 2010. That 20-gallon difference translates to roughly 60–100 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.

Are the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 and Kingfisher 3050 2010 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 and the Kingfisher 3050 2010 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow CC 2013 full specs ← Kingfisher 3050 2010 full specs