Matching a modified vee Kingfisher 1825 Trio Side Console 2012 against a deep vee Kingfisher 1875 Falcon 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Kingfisher 1825 Trio Side Console 2012 at 17,7 ft versus Kingfisher 1875 Falcon 2013 at 18,0 ft. At 11 lbs and 16 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Kingfisher 1875 Falcon 2013 has a 85-hp advantage over the Kingfisher 1825 Trio Side Console 2012's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Kingfisher 1875 Falcon 2013 carries 35 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Kingfisher 1825 Trio Side Console 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Kingfisher 1875 Falcon 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 0 lbs per hp for the Kingfisher 1825 Trio Side Console 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.