Matching a modified vee Kingfisher 1825 Trio SC 2013 against a deep vee Kingfisher 2425 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Kingfisher 2425 2013 measures 24,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 6,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Kingfisher 1825 Trio SC 2013 at 17,7 feet (2013). At 105 lbs and 32 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 230 hp, the Kingfisher 2425 2013 has a 115-hp advantage over the Kingfisher 1825 Trio SC 2013's 115-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Kingfisher 2425 2013 carries 125 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Kingfisher 1825 Trio SC 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Kingfisher 2425 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Kingfisher 1825 Trio SC 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Kingfisher 2425 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Kingfisher 2425 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 24,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Kingfisher 1825 Trio SC 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.