Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation
Kingfisher 1800 Trio Tiller 2012 vs Kingfisher 1975 Fastwater 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat
Matching a modified vee Kingfisher 1800 Trio Tiller 2012 against a deep vee Kingfisher 1975 Fastwater 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Kingfisher 1800 Trio Tiller 2012 at 17,7 ft versus Kingfisher 1975 Fastwater 2013 at 19,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 1975 Fastwater 2013 tips the scales at 183 lbs — 172 lbs less than the Kingfisher 1800 Trio Tiller 2012 at 11 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Kingfisher 1975 Fastwater 2013 has a 130-hp advantage over the Kingfisher 1800 Trio Tiller 2012's 70-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Kingfisher 1975 Fastwater 2013 carries 45 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Kingfisher 1800 Trio Tiller 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Kingfisher 1975 Fastwater 2013 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Kingfisher 1800 Trio Tiller 2012 with its 70-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeKingfisher
MakeKingfisher
Model1800 Trio Tiller
Model1975 Fastwater
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam79 in. (200 cm)
Beam82 in. (2.08 m)
Beam - Meters2.01
Beam - Meters2.08
Beam - Inches79
Beam - Inches82
Deadrise12°
Deadrise14° constant
Weight - Detail1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Weight - Detail1,830 lbs. (830 kg)
Weight - kg498.95
Weight - kg830.07
Weight - lbs.11
Weight - lbs.183
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in. (1.52 m)
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 66 in. (1.68 m)
Height - DetailSides: 23 in. (58 cm)
Height - DetailSides: 32 in. (81 cm)
Height - Meters0.58
Height - Meters0.81
Height - Inches23
Height - Inches32
Height [transom]20 in. (51 cm)
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet17.67
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 8 in. (538 cm)
Length overall - Detail19 ft. (5.79 m)
Length overall - Meters5.38
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Inches212
Length overall - Inches228
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.102 in. (2.6 mm) Bottom: 0.16 in. (4 mm)
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 in. (3.2 mm) Bottom: 0.19 in. (4.8 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - DetailOptional 20 gal. (75 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail45 gal. (170 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters75.71
Fuel tank capacity - Liters170.34
Fuel tank capacity - Gal2
Fuel tank capacity - Gal45
Engine max70 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelOptimax Sport Jet
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower200 hp
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight2,800 lbs