Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013
2013
View full specs →

Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 vs Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 against a modified vee Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 at 17,5 ft versus Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 at 19,0 ft. At 156 lbs and 169 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 has a 50-hp advantage over the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 35 gal and 35 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 and its 200-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 with its 150-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeKingfisher
MakeKingfisher
Model1725 Flex SPT
Model1925 Flex SPT
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in. (2.45 m)
Beam96 in. (2.45 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches96
Deadrise18° variable
DeadriseVariable 18&#176
Weight - Detail1,560 lbs. (708 kg)
Weight - Detail1,690 lbs. (767 kg)
Weight - kg707.6
Weight - kg766.57
Weight - lbs.156
Weight - lbs.169
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 82 in. (2.08 cm)
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 82 in. (2.08 m)
Height - DetailSide: 27 in. (68.5 cm)
Height - DetailSides: 27 in. (68.5 cm)
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Inches27
Height - Inches27
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Height [transom]25 in. (64 cm)
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet19
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in. (5.33 m)
Length overall - Detail19 ft. (5.79 m)
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.79
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches228
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 in. (3.2 mm) Bottom: 0.160 in. (4 mm)
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 in. (3.2 mm) Bottom: 0.160 in. (4 mm)
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (132 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal. (132 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max150 hp
Engine max200 hp
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Weight2,800 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Operational Info
Storagenot available
StorageLivewell: 24 gal. (90 l)

Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 vs Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 or the Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013?
The Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 comes in at 17,5 feet, making it roughly 1,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 or the Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013?
For trailering, the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 has the edge at 156 lbs dry weight versus 169 lbs for the Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 is rated to a maximum of 200 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Do these boats require an oversize trailer permit to tow on US highways?
Both the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 and Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 share an 96 in. (2.45 m) beam — meaning both sit right at the 8’6" threshold that most US states use for standard-width loads. In most states you can tow at that width without a special permit, but regulations vary. Always check the rules for your state and any states you'll be passing through before your first long haul.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 and Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 35 gallons and 35 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 and Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SPT 2013 and the Kingfisher 1925 Flex SPT 2013 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.