Matching a deep vee Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 against a modified vee Kingfisher 1925 Flex SC 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 at 17,5 ft versus Kingfisher 1925 Flex SC 2013 at 19,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 1925 Flex SC 2013 tips the scales at 1 625 lbs — 130 lbs less than the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 at 1 495 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The Kingfisher 1925 Flex SC 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Engine specs for the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 35 gal and 35 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 and Kingfisher 1925 Flex SC 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.