Matching a deep vee Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 against a tunnel Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 at 17,5 ft versus Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow 2013 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 tips the scales at 1 495 lbs — 1 314 lbs more than the Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow 2013 at 181 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Kingfisher 1875 Extreme Shallow 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Engine specs for the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 35 gal and 36 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.