Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 boat specs
Kingfisher
Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013
2013
View full specs →

Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 vs Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 — A Close Look at Two Deep Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 and the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 are deep vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 at 17,5 ft versus Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 at 17,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 tips the scales at 2 281 lbs — 786 lbs less than the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 at 1 495 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 tops out at 200 hp. Engine specs for the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 35 gal and 36 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 and Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeKingfisher
MakeKingfisher
Model1725 Flex SC
Model1775 Extreme Duty
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam94 in. (2.39 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.39
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches94
Deadrise18° variable
Deadrise8°
Weight - Detail1,495 lbs
Weight - Detail2,281 lbs. (1,035 kg)
Weight - kg678.12
Weight - kg1034.64
Weight - lbs.1495
Weight - lbs.2281
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 82 in
Width [transom] - DetailBottom: 72 in. (1.83 m)
Height - DetailSides: 27 in
Height - DetailSides: 33 in. (84 cm)
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Meters0.84
Height - Inches27
Height - Inches33
Length - Feet17.5
Length - Feet17.67
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 8 in. (5.43 m)
Length overall - Meters5.33
Length overall - Meters5.38
Length overall - Inches21
Length overall - Inches212
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessSide: 0.125 Bottom: 0.16
Hull thicknessBow Section: 0.25 in. (6.4 mm) Wings: 0.25 in. (6.4 mm) Center Keel: 0.375 in. (9.5 mm) Transom Reinforcing: 0.25 in. (6.4 mm)
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail35 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail36 gal. (135 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters132.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters136.27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal35
Fuel tank capacity - Gal36
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typenot available
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelOptimax Sport Jet
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower200 hp
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailEZ Loader
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight2,800 lbs

Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 vs Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 or the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013?
The Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 is the longer of the two at 17,7 feet overall. The Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 comes in at 17,5 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 or the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013?
For trailering, the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 has the edge at 1 495 lbs dry weight versus 2 281 lbs for the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 has a documented max rating of 200 hp. Engine specifications for the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 measures 96" wide, compared to 94" for the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 and Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 35 gallons and 36 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 and Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Kingfisher 1725 Flex SC 2013 and the Kingfisher 1775 Extreme Duty 2013 are built by Kingfisher. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.